Hi -
I’m want to to create some standardized “parts” that I can simply reuse.
Some examples (I am only looking at the receiver, no transmitting *yet*)
The SDR_DONGLE Has 3 interfaces or “ports"
INPUT: Desired Center Frequency in HZ
OUTPUT: The I/Q Data stream
OUTPUT:
Note that the shell script is for converting 3.6 GRC flowgraphs to 3.7, not
CPP code. I don't think such a unicorn exists, but maybe that's not what
you were asking for after all.
When I upgraded an old codebase, I broke down and started over from scratch
with gr-modtool, copying over the relevan
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Vanhoy, Garrett M - (gvanhoy) <
gvan...@email.arizona.edu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have sent this to the list once before, but I did not see it show up on
> the index so I am assuming it did not work after waiting some time.
>
>
> I am attempting to embed the liqui
Also, http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/Move_3-6_to_3-7
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> https://github.com/n-west/n-west.github.com/blob/master/grc_to_37.sh
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, John Malsbury
> wrote:
>> I am toying with the hypothetical
https://github.com/n-west/n-west.github.com/blob/master/grc_to_37.sh
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, John Malsbury
wrote:
> I am toying with the hypothetical idea of bringing a large and fragmented
> OOT codebase out of the stone age. I remember hearing about a tool that
> would convert Cpp bl
I am toying with the hypothetical idea of bringing a large and fragmented
OOT codebase out of the stone age. I remember hearing about a tool that
would convert Cpp blocks from 3.6 to the 3.7 API. Was that a real thing?
Also, what will 3.8 break and will everyone think less of me if I spend 4-5
y
Thank you Marcus. I was overlooking the input fields in the property
settings for the hier block. As usual the answer seems simple once it is
explained.
-Ed
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Marcus Müller
wrote:
> For lazy people: This is about generating hier blocks with GRC.
>
> Ed, you're d
Hey!
As fas as I can tell, you don't check if the output buffer can actually
take that many samples. Thus "you end up in the middle of invalid
memory". At least that's what I guess from the code I can see. You need
to ensure that 'noutput_items' always holds a value greater than your
final 't
