if someone has already asked this question, but I wasn't
able to find this answer while searching through the mailing list
archives. Thanks for your help.
--
--------
Ketan Mandke
University of Texas at Austin
Wireless Networking &
that I set up the USRP, but I haven't found
anything yet that could be causing this. I will continue to try and
diagnose the problem, and keep you abreast of any developments.
FYI, here's a list of the different hardware I've tried:
USRP (v1) - rev 4.1 and 4.5
RFX2
Matt,
I've created a simple page for forwarding users to the gnuradio.org
site. Hopefully someone can just copy the news to the mainpage of the
old GNU Radio website.
http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~mandke/gnuradio/index.html
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Di
timestamp between the RX
chains. Hope that wasn't too confusing.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:38:47PM -0500, Ketan Mandke wrote:
>
>> The timestamp for packets should corrsepond to the
>> time when
eeding
samples should have the same timestamp).
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
se of your research group ;)
>
> I spend all of my time working with the single chain, and if I find bugs I
> can fix them. But I think you're the only ones using the dual chain... so
> your feedback is useful and I'd appreciate any help s
hould arrive
sometime in the future. We are clueless as to why this might be
happening.
This seems to happen 1 in every 5k-10k usb_packets.
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
built after applying whatever fixes George
was referring to? Anyway, thanks a lot for your help.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:45 PM, George Nychis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ketan Mandke wrote:
>>
>> Eric & George,
>>
>> Thanks for quick responses. I al
gt; connected to the master_control module in the inband case.
>>
>
> Hi Ketan,
>
> I'm not sure which RBF you're using from us. I'd suggest the latest one in
> the trunk. Older ones we had made some modifications to master control.
&
set_auto_tr(False). Any thoughts?
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
daughter
boards, or have any idea why this might be happening?
Hydra: http://hydra.ece.utexas.edu
--
Ketan Mandke
On Jan 24, 2008 9:16 PM, Ketan Mandke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if my problems are necessarily caused by USRP overflows,
> but I have
edora)
GR version: 3.1.0
RF: Flex2400 Rev 30
USRP: version 4.1
PHY: custom design based on 802.11n
Interp/Decim rates: 128/64
--
Please let me know if you feel more specifics will help you answer my
question. Thanks.
Hydra: http://hydra.ece.utexas.edu
--
Ketan M
Correction. The "-O" fix that I thought I had only works some of the
time. This is a very peculiar bug.
On Dec 11, 2007 8:24 PM, Ketan Mandke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently created an object which spawns an omni_thread and then
> cleans it up when stop() is cal
ave had a chance to be completely freed up. In
general, I could really use some guidelines (do's and especially
don'ts) for creating classes that inherit from omni_thread.
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gn
t just doesn't have the right interface.
- SWIG version: 1.3.31
- GNU Radio version: 3.1.0
Thanks for your help.
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
oriented m-blocks utilize a different interface to
the USRP which will make this alignment-task easier?
On 8/29/07, Martin Dvh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ketan Mandke wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > I've been searching through the mailing list for more information
> &g
status of this effort, and when (if at all) do you think
that this functionality might be implemented?
links:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-4-x-4-MIMO-transmitting-and-receiving-tf3605863.html#a10074272
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-USRP-Tx-Question-tf1452214.html#a3924517
--
Ketan M
ing
multiple USRP boards? Specifically, do you have to go through any
special process to ensure that transmitted samples are properly
aligned?
--
Ketan Mandke
http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http
the IQ channels. Please let me know if you would like me to
elaborate further on this bug or the fix.
On 7/21/07, Ketan Mandke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric,
Thanks for your quick response. In regards to your comments:
> Are you running one of our standard fpga images, or are you using
olution.
On 7/20/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:02:55PM -0500, Ketan Mandke wrote:
> I have been experiencing a weird bug when transmitting packets using the
> USRP. I am part of the Hydra group at UT (hydra.ece.utexas.edu). We have
> been d
ystem, so I set the usrp.sink_c mux
value to 0xBA98. This should enable the USRP to support to transmit RF
chains, right?
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
fy the shape of the interpolation filter?
In particular, has anyone implemented other interpolation filters and a
mechanism for selecting from such a set?
--
Ketan Mandke
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/m
22 matches
Mail list logo
