.com/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=Swig&searchon=sourcenames
Best regards,
Maximilian Stiefel
Lördag den 17 februari 2018 skrev Andreas Weller:
> Hi.
> I'm trying to follow the instructions
> onhttp://www.irrational.net/2014/03/02/digital-atv/
>
&
Hi Brad,
Hi Marcus,
@ Brad:
The basic properties of the Fourier transform give you this symmetry.
In general the Fourier transform has the following property, usually
refered to as conjungation:
F{ x*(t) } = X*(-jw).
For purely real input signals, this boils down to
Xr(jw) = Xr(-jw) (even)
Hi Brad,
> Taking a step back, maybe the mirroring is a product of the method I'm
> using to interpret the output of the FFT.
I really do not think so, because, as explained below and in the
previous mail, the phenomenon, we witness here, results from the
physics behind signal theory.
As I
Hej Prabhat,
>From a python point of view the sync word has to be a tuple e.g. (1, 1j, 1,
>1j). What you have is a list. That's why this exception is raised.
Regards,
Max
Tisdag den 3 april 2018 skrev Prabhat Kumar Rai:
> Hi,
> I have been working on LTE UPLINK in GNURADIO with help of *OF
Hello everybody,
it is as far as I know not that convenient to import taps from a filter
design file to a design in grc.
On stackoverflow it was mentioned, that there is apparently a
workarround using numpy.fromfile('filename'):
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36744843/passing-taps-to-t
Hello Laura,
It is definitely not afternoon here in Sweden. There is no flowgraph attached.
Happens to me as well, every time ;)
This output usually indicates you are doing are something, that causes samples
to be dropped, i.e. not transmitted, because something is not fast enough.
What sample
Hello everbody,
upsampling a complex data stream gives me headaches :( In my flowgraph
the upsampling is done by multiplexing 7 zeros with 1 data sample and
feeding this into a FIR filter, which is how everybody does it as I
understood. However, for further processing I have to take the delay
