On 05/30/2012 11:46 AM, Ian Buckley wrote:
> There is a mictor connector (J301 on both USRP2 and N2x0) that has 32 signal
> and 2 clock pins all free to be used in the FPGA. Searching for "mictor" in
> the archive of this forum will find other posts about this.
>
> However I do want to drive hom
There is a mictor connector (J301 on both USRP2 and N2x0) that has 32
signal and 2 clock pins all free to be used in the FPGA. Searching for
"mictor" in the archive of this forum will find other posts about this.
However I do want to drive home the point that you are unlikely to
find an ARM p
There is a mictor connector (J301 on both USRP2 and N2x0) that has 32 signal
and 2 clock pins all free to be used in the FPGA. Searching for "mictor" in the
archive of this forum will find other posts about this.
However I do want to drive home the point that you are unlikely to find an ARM
pr
I don't believe there's a document for this it's more of an exercise left
for the motivated user.
On May 30, 2012 6:27 AM, "Page Jack" wrote:
> Hi Almohanad ,
> thanks for this information, can you provide more detail or is there any
> doc?
>
> On 5/30/12, Almohanad Fayez wrote:
> > If memory se
Hi Almohanad ,
thanks for this information, can you provide more detail or is there any doc?
On 5/30/12, Almohanad Fayez wrote:
> If memory serves correctly the n200 or the usrp 2 has an fpga expansion
> interface to some xilinx development platform which you might be able to
> use to create a cu
If memory serves correctly the n200 or the usrp 2 has an fpga expansion
interface to some xilinx development platform which you might be able to
use to create a custom solution to serve your needs.
Al
On May 29, 2012 6:17 PM, "Page Jack" wrote:
> I don't want to using a ethernet wire to connect
I don't want to using a ethernet wire to connect N series to an ARM board.
anyone have tried
build N series with ARM or DSP in one board which means the ethernet line
between N and
the processor is on PCB.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 09:18 PM, Page Jack
On 05/25/2012 09:18 PM, Page Jack wrote:
> Hi Philip,
> How does the conclusion be made that ARM can not swallow the current
> max data transfer rate? I need to build a project that need to process
> 60MB/s data, so any way to achieve my goal. Use a more powerful CPU or
> use dsp on the omap?
60 M
Hi Philip,
How does the conclusion be made that ARM can not swallow the current
max data transfer rate? I need to build a project that need to process
60MB/s data, so any way to achieve my goal. Use a more powerful CPU or
use dsp on the omap?
On 5/25/12, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 09:
