Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-22 Thread Dimitris Symeonidis
I got boost 1.36 installed on ubuntu 8.04.1. I didn't tell it to use /opt/boost_1_36_0, so it went to /usr/local/lib. I re-compiled gnuradio (bootstrap, configure, etc) without telling it where to find boost. I just did the "broken libtool" thing (edit /etc/ld.so.conf). Kind regards On Fri, Aug 2

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-22 Thread Carles Fernandez
I followed gnuradio/README.building-boost (from the trunk) and it run smoothly on Ubuntu 8.04: Download the latest version of boost from boost.sourceforge.net. (boost_1_36_0.tar.bz2 was the latest when this was written) unpack it somewhere cd into the resulting directory $ cd boost_1_36_0 # Pic

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-22 Thread Frank Brickle
In /opt/boost_1_36_beta on 8.04 with kernel 2.6.24-21-rt. ./configure --with-boost=/opt/boost_1_36_beta --enable-doxygen --no-create --no-recursion Frank On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Firas A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Has anyone been able to install boost 1.35 or 1.36 on Ubun

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-22 Thread Firas A.
Hi, Has anyone been able to install boost 1.35 or 1.36 on Ubuntu OS system? Regards, Firas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/boost-1.35-tp19100103p19104236.html Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-21 Thread Brett L. Trotter
I apologize for missing the announcement. I'm guilty of filtering out most of the stuff that doesn't pertain to my application :) SMP is a very good thing. My question was mainly if this was an accidental dependency, did we really want to be using non-mainstream software in the core, but obviously

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:50:26PM -0500, Brett L. Trotter wrote: > I may be mistaken, but when I last svn updated off the trunk, boost > 1.35+ was required. This is not yet in the Fedora repositories (1.36 > beta is in development however) and means building gnuradio with a > standard system is no

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-21 Thread Brian Padalino
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Brett L. Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I may be mistaken, but when I last svn updated off the trunk, boost > 1.35+ was required. This is not yet in the Fedora repositories (1.36 > beta is in development however) and means building gnuradio with a > standard s

[Discuss-gnuradio] boost 1.35

2008-08-21 Thread Brett L. Trotter
I may be mistaken, but when I last svn updated off the trunk, boost 1.35+ was required. This is not yet in the Fedora repositories (1.36 beta is in development however) and means building gnuradio with a standard system is not possible. While one can find the 1.36 src rpm and build it, it's a bit o

[Discuss-gnuradio] Boost 1.35

2008-08-08 Thread Eric Blossom
I'm getting ready to merge the multi-processor scheduler feature branch into the trunk. Besides adding support for SMP machines, this removes the single top block restriction. This merge will add a dependency on a relatively new version of boost, 1.35, which was released on March 29th, 2008. If