Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-04-02 Thread Jonathan Preheim
> > > > > > >Make sure both your radios are locked to the same clock source. > > > > > > Any fsignificant requency offset between the two is going to > ruin your > > > > > > correlation peaks very quickly. > > > > > > >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-03-18 Thread CEL
; > > it's BPSK, and we'd want to apply compensation in order to achieve > > > > roughly that, right? > > > > > > > > T'hanks, > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:00 PM Qasim Chaudhari

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-03-17 Thread Jonathan Preheim
udhari < >>> qasim.chaudh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >Make sure both your radios are locked to the same clock source. >>>> Any fsignificant requency offset between the two is going to ruin your >>>> correlation peaks very quickly. &

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-02-27 Thread Qasim Chaudhari
ow good the CFO >> estimate is. >> >> Cheers, >> Qasim >> >> >> Message: 4 >>> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:07:51 +0100 >>> From: Sylvain Munaut <246...@gmail.com> >>> To: Jonathan Preheim >>> Cc: GNURadio Discussion L

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-02-27 Thread Qasim Chaudhari
the same clock source. >>> Any fsignificant requency offset between the two is going to ruin your >>> correlation peaks very quickly. >>> >>> When the same clock source is not possible due to the distance between >>> them, the carrier frequency offset

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-02-27 Thread CEL
gt; > > > Cheers, > > Qasim > > > > > > > Message: 4 > > > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:07:51 +0100 > > > From: Sylvain Munaut <246...@gmail.com> > > > To: Jonathan Preheim > > > Cc: GNURadio Discussion List > > > S

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-02-27 Thread Jonathan Preheim
gt;> From: Sylvain Munaut <246...@gmail.com> >> To: Jonathan Preheim >> Cc: GNURadio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation >> Message-ID: >> > uo2tdw...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plai

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-02-26 Thread Qasim Chaudhari
: Jonathan Preheim > Cc: GNURadio Discussion List > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation > Message-ID: > uo2tdw...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > Any ideas about how we can troublesho

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-02-26 Thread Sylvain Munaut
> Any ideas about how we can troubleshoot this more effectively? Or better > model the channel? Make sure both your radios are locked to the same clock source. Any fsignificant requency offset between the two is going to ruin your correlation peaks very quickly. Frequency offset is going to end

[Discuss-gnuradio] Distance Measurement by Correlation

2019-02-25 Thread Jonathan Preheim
Hi all, I am trying to measure the distance between two BladeRFs by comparing the phase of a pseudorandom (PN) code in GNU Radio Companion. Radio 1 streams the code (+/- 1s, so BPSK) on one frequency, Radio 2 just retransmits it on a different frequency. Radio 1 receives that delayed code. An FIR