If I can't change the bandwidth covered, that's okay, as long as I can be confident in that the analog RSSI will cover the constant ~30MHz that you say it does, and that I can cover different ~30 MHz chunks based on what I set the carrier frequency to be.
-Michael Ford-On 7/25/06, Matt Ettus <[EMAI
The way we have envisioned RSSI is as a 3-part measurement:
Analog RSSI
Digital RSSI in FPGA (from output of ADCs)
Digital RSSI in host (computed however you like, from the
channelized signal sent over the bus by the USRP)
If you want to use the measured analog RSSI, it will measure w
Matt,I'll actually want to be able to control how far I can detect interference from my carrier, and the carrier I'll be detecting interference from. Do I have no choice but to cover ~30Mhz at a time?-Michael Ford-
On 7/25/06, Matt Ettus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Ford wrote:> So, I'm tryin
Michael Ford wrote:
So, I'm trying tomake a system where nodes communicate, not on set
channels, but on as much of the spectrum as they can use based on the
level of interference. For example, we know that 802.11 divides the
spectrum into 13 channels with the center frequencies set at 5MHz
ap
So, I'm trying tomake a system where nodes communicate, not on set channels, but on as much of the spectrum as they can use based on the level of interference. For example, we know that 802.11 divides the spectrum into 13 channels with the center frequencies set at 5MHz apart. In my ideal situation
