Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] E100 Performance

2011-06-30 Thread Ralf
Am 29.06.2011 16:34, schrieb Marcus D. Leech: On 29/06/2011 9:11 AM, Ralf wrote: Hi, the simple GRC in the attachment creates lots of underflows on our E100 (U on console) and dropouts when looking at the spectrum. Is this as expected or how can this overload of the embedded Linux be

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] E100 Performance

2011-06-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 06/30/2011 05:27 AM, Ralf wrote: Hi Marcus, thanks for your reply. That is very important for us to understand. How is the divider 512 determined? It is in the FPGA I suppose. Where can read more about the FPGA besides this small text?

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] E100 Performance

2011-06-30 Thread Matthias Wilhelm
Am 30.06.2011 um 11:27 schrieb Ralf: Am 29.06.2011 16:34, schrieb Marcus D. Leech: On 29/06/2011 9:11 AM, Ralf wrote: Hi, the simple GRC in the attachment creates lots of underflows on our E100 (U on console) and dropouts when looking at the spectrum. Is this as expected or how can

[Discuss-gnuradio] E100 Performance

2011-06-29 Thread Ralf
Hi, the simple GRC in the attachment creates lots of underflows on our E100 (U on console) and dropouts when looking at the spectrum. Is this as expected or how can this overload of the embedded Linux be avoided? Thanks, Ralf ?xml version='1.0' encoding='ASCII'? flow_graph timestampWed

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] E100 Performance

2011-06-29 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 29/06/2011 9:11 AM, Ralf wrote: Hi, the simple GRC in the attachment creates lots of underflows on our E100 (U on console) and dropouts when looking at the spectrum. Is this as expected or how can this overload of the embedded Linux be avoided? Thanks, Ralf Well, for one, 60Khz isn't a