--- On Thu, 1/20/11, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> From: Elvis Dowson
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNURadio is disappointing [was: Greeting and
> a question]
> To: "Tom Rondeau" , "Matt Ettus"
> Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> Date: Thursday, Janua
On 21.01.2011 10:19, Martin Braun wrote:
> But all these open hardware threads seem to neglect that there's a
> powerful *software* tool out there for real-time signal processing, and
> a lot is happening at that end. GNU Radio is much more than the USRPs;
> in fact, it's *not even* the USRPs.
> I
Hi Marcus,
I believe you are a good technical starter than to talk about market.
If you are to talk about $20 ADC/DAC i would rather disassociate from your
discussion.
If you would bet on million dollar to donate to GnuRadio, then i will prove
about the pricing you are talking about.
S--
On Fri
Hi Martin/all,
There is need for open source platform for GNURadio. I request people of
concern to understand my view. Am not at all against GNURadio.Its in fact
GNURadio gave birth to open source platform. But what i see is there is a
split as of date against software and hardware. In order to cu
Hi there people,
I'd like to put my point here.
I'm a Computer Scientist and Ham radio operator that is entering in this
SDR world. I own a USRP with RFX900, WBX, dbxrx, tvrx, basicrx and
basictx.
ps: I don't make my monthly budget with anything related with SDR.
I already gave some talks and wor
On 01/21/2011 04:19 AM, Martin Braun wrote:
>
> Talking of which: Who actually *does* use GNU Radio? I can't see a whole
> lot of active projects going on, not on this list or on CGRAN.
>
>
I use Gnu Radio for a number of things in the "science radio" space. I
have a small suite of
tools I ca
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:19:37 +0100, Martin Braun
wrote:
> And with all the drawbacks and bugs that GNU Radio has, there's nothing
> comparable in the open source domain. So if GNU Radio really sucks,
> then how about a proper discussion on what's wrong. And not about which
> HF-fronten
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:20:43AM +0530, Sanjay Singh wrote:
> Its not about talking high. Its community of people trying hard to press Ettus
> Research products. Putting people down is not the motto of GNURadio.
>
> Regrading putting off from the list: Discussion is on for open source
> platfor
Its not about talking high. Its community of people trying hard to press
Ettus Research products. Putting people down is not the motto of GNURadio.
Regrading putting off from the list: Discussion is on for open source
platform. This is GNURadio platform. Here discussions are open for Ettus
Researc
Hi Tom & Matt,
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Marcus D. Leech"
>>
> So, respectfully, you're full of crap, Sanjay. No "BSP" is going to
> automatically know how to do all the functions we want to do:
Someone ought to moderate this list. I for one find Marcus annoying. He
mentioned that h
On 01/20/2011 02:10 PM, Sanjay Singh wrote:
Hi all,
To be specific to concern
2) Create your own digital/baseband board
> Check out many thesis work who have developed demonstrating
platforms. Adding to commercial front, check SP601/605 from Avnet.
Check for the prices for sure!. Also che
Hi all,
To be specific to concern
1) Create your own RF front end boards
> putting mixer and LO is a handy breadboard work.. tryout some good
examples from Analog Devices and TI. To get additional gains put LNA or PA
in series. Learn basic hardware designs.
2) Create your own digital/baseb
I changed the subject to better match the tone of the email.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Sanjay Singh
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am disappointed with the way GNURadio is getting into.
>
> I see all the discussion around is to promote the products of Ettus
> Research.
>
> Agreed!. Great work from
13 matches
Mail list logo
