Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-24 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Paul M. Bendixen wrote: > Hi again > > 2011/10/20 Josh Blum > >> >> [snip] >> You need to clean your source directory. This file should not exist: >> /home/expert/skole/speciale/GnuRadio/git/volk/include/volk/volk.h:7:29: >> error: volk/volk_config.h: Ingen sådan

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-24 Thread Paul M. Bendixen
Hi again 2011/10/20 Josh Blum > > [snip] > You need to clean your source directory. This file should not exist: > /home/expert/skole/speciale/GnuRadio/git/volk/include/volk/volk.h:7:29: > error: volk/volk_config.h: Ingen sådan fil eller filkatalog > > Can you git clean -dfx and try again? > > Do

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-24 Thread Martin Braun
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:20:50AM +0800, Daniel Dekst wrote: > > Thanks, no further error. > > 'make check' returns no rule to make check, but we can 'make install' without > error. Hi Daniel, cmake uses 'make test'. MB -- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Communications Engineering La

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-23 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Jordan Otomo wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried the following: > > $ cd gnuradio > $ git checkout next > $ git pull > $ mkdir build > $ cd build > $ cmake ../ > $ make > $ make test > $ sudo make install > > 'make test' returns 0 failures, but when using the gr-digital bl

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-23 Thread Jordan Otomo
Hi, I've tried the following: $ cd gnuradio $ git checkout next $ git pull $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake ../ $ make $ make test $ sudo make install 'make test' returns 0 failures, but when using the gr-digital blocks in GRC, I see the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): F

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-21 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 21/10/2011 3:20 PM, Daniel Dekst wrote: Thanks, no further error. 'make check' returns no rule to make check, but we can 'make install' without error. A problem is that the PYTHONPATH is not set, so we get error 'cannot find gnuradio' when we are trying to run an example. Even though I put

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-21 Thread Daniel Dekst
> >Message: 23 >Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:46:48 -0700 >From: Josh Blum >To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2) >Message-ID: <4ea10748.30...@ettus.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-21 Thread Philip Balister
On 10/21/2011 01:46 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > On 10/20/2011 10:22 PM, Daniel Dekst wrote: >> >> Tried on USRP E100 kernel module 3.0.0 >> Error when make. >> >> [ 13%] Building C object >> gnuradio-core/src/lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-core.dir/filter/dotprod_fff_armv7_a.c.o >> /program/gnuradio/gnu

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
fp -g" -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING="-mcpu=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -g" -josh > > > 2011/10/20 > > >> Message: 10 >> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:43:32 -0700 >> From: Tom Rondeau >> To: GNURadio Discussion List >>

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel Dekst
ror 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 2011/10/20 >Message: 10 >Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:43:32 -0700 >From: Tom Rondeau >To: GNURadio Discussion List >Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2) >Message-ID: >        >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Worked perfectly, first-attempt, with no special flags, on Arch =) Cheers, Ben I just built in on Fedora 14, on an AMD64 multi-core system. Flawless. -- Marcus Leech Principal Investigator Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium http://www.sbrac.org _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Ben Hilburn
Worked perfectly, first-attempt, with no special flags, on Arch =) Cheers, Ben On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > Another big change is happening today! Josh Blum has make GNU Radio build > using cmake, and we are hoping to switch over to it completely. The 'next' > branch h

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Arturo Rinaldi
Il 20/10/2011 20:53, Josh Blum ha scritto: does this mean that i could perform the steps /mkdir build cd build cmake -DCPACK_GENERATOR=DEB ../ make package/ and make deb(s) of the current git release ? which is the switch to Basically, yes that will generate a big deb file f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 2:35 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: I think he might be using ML's build-gnuradio script, which installs to lib64 if the directory exists, regardless of whether the operating system in RH. That's why I was confused when it didn't install to lib64 when I was testing cmake. _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
> does this mean that i could perform the steps > > /mkdir build > cd build > cmake -DCPACK_GENERATOR=DEB ../ > make package/ > > and make deb(s) of the current git release ? which is the switch to Basically, yes that will generate a big deb file for the whole project. There are

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Dan CaJacob
On 10/20/2011 02:01 PM, Josh Blum wrote: On 10/20/2011 10:46 AM, Alexandru Csete wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Josh Blum wrote: On 10/19/2011 08:42 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possib

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Paul M. Bendixen wrote: > 2011/10/20 Josh Blum > >> >>> >>> Volk usually also fails on the old install, the problem is , I think it >>> should detect that it was no good and take it out of the build entirely? >>> >> >> No, this is a bug that needs to be fixed. Please hel

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Arturo Rinaldi
Il 20/10/2011 03:43, Tom Rondeau ha scritto: Another big change is happening today! Josh Blum has make GNU Radio build using cmake, and we are hoping to switch over to it completely. The 'next' branch has just pulled in his changes, and we now have parallel build systems, cmake and autofoo. We

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 10:46 AM, Alexandru Csete wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Josh Blum wrote: >> >> >> On 10/19/2011 08:42 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: >>> On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possible. >>> Build went smoothly

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Alexandru Csete
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > On 10/19/2011 08:42 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: >> On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: >>> ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possible. >> Build went smoothly with cmake on Ubuntu 11.10 x64  Unfortunately, it >> bui

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Ben Hilburn
> > Also, because i use gentoo, I earlier had to give the QWT dir in order for > gnuradio to build gr-qtgui, the cmake now writes: > -- Could NOT find Qwt (missing: QWT_INCLUDE_DIRS) > ... > -- Configuring gr-qtgui support... > -- Dependency Boost_FOUND = TRUE > -- Dependency QT4_FOUND = YES > -- D

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Dan CaJacob
On 10/20/2011 12:02 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 20/10/2011 11:59 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote: On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Martin Braun wrote: One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be part of 'make install' (or am I the only one who h

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 20/10/2011 11:59 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote: On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Martin Braun wrote: One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be part of 'make install' (or am I the only one who has this problem?). I had the same problem. But

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Dan CaJacob
On 10/20/2011 09:00 AM, Martin Braun wrote: One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be part of 'make install' (or am I the only one who has this problem?). I had the same problem. But after runnin it and setting the PYTHONPATH,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > > > Volk usually also fails on the old install, the problem is , I think it > > should detect that it was no good and take it out of the build entirely? > > > > No, this is a bug that needs to be fixed. Please help. Provide compiler > versio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
> > Volk usually also fails on the old install, the problem is , I think it > should detect that it was no good and take it out of the build entirely? > No, this is a bug that needs to be fixed. Please help. Provide compiler version gcc --version and all error verbose. Thanks. > >> Also, cmak

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Paul M. Bendixen
2011/10/20 Josh Blum > > > On 10/20/2011 04:19 AM, Paul M. Bendixen wrote: > > Hi happy to hear it, autotools were complaining about old syntax on my > > machine > > > > Using gentoo (not too heavily updated I'm afraid) and not succeding > > > > Configuring using cmake went well, but compiling di

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/20/2011 04:19 AM, Paul M. Bendixen wrote: > Hi happy to hear it, autotools were complaining about old syntax on my > machine > > Using gentoo (not too heavily updated I'm afraid) and not succeding > > Configuring using cmake went well, but compiling didn't, already at first > stop volk (t

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Martin Braun
> Details about using cmake can be found here: > http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/CMakeWork I'm loving it! And less build stuff thanks to the lack of usrp*... great! One thing that doesn't work perfect here: I always have to run 'ldconfig' after installation. Couldn't that be pa

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-20 Thread Paul M. Bendixen
Hi happy to hear it, autotools were complaining about old syntax on my machine Using gentoo (not too heavily updated I'm afraid) and not succeding Configuring using cmake went well, but compiling didn't, already at first stop volk (that I'm not entirely sure i need) a _lot_ of errors occured. To

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-19 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/19/2011 08:42 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: > On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: >> ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possible. > Build went smoothly with cmake on Ubuntu 11.10 x64 Unfortunately, it > built as 32 bit, but it works. I usually build with Marcus Le

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-19 Thread Dan CaJacob
On 10/19/2011 09:43 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: ... we need people to start using it and testing as much as possible. Build went smoothly with cmake on Ubuntu 11.10 x64 Unfortunately, it built as 32 bit, but it works. I usually build with Marcus Leech's script which handles the architecture automa

[Discuss-gnuradio] New build structure! (Warning #2)

2011-10-19 Thread Tom Rondeau
Another big change is happening today! Josh Blum has make GNU Radio build using cmake, and we are hoping to switch over to it completely. The 'next' branch has just pulled in his changes, and we now have parallel build systems, cmake and autofoo. We are trying to make cmake the default build system