Martin DvH wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:26 -0400, Tom Lutz wrote:
>
>
> gnuradio depends heavily on floating point performance and memory
> bandwidth.
> It makes good use of multiple cores.
>
> So if you can afford it use a quad-core processor with a high memory
> bandwidth.
> ( i7 quad or
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:26 -0400, Tom Lutz wrote:
> This may be a somewhat banal question, but what would be the optimal
> hardware/software configuration needed to leverage the power of
> gnuradio?
>
> Core i7 versus Core2 Duo versus Other (maybe cell)?
gnuradio depends heavily on floating point
Awesome! Thanks for the info. I don't think I'm using the fft
filters, so I'll give that a shot.
Tom
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:26:18AM -0400, Tom Lutz wrote:
>> This may be a somewhat banal question, but what would be the optimal
>> hard
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:26:18AM -0400, Tom Lutz wrote:
> This may be a somewhat banal question, but what would be the optimal
> hardware/software configuration needed to leverage the power of
> gnuradio?
>
> Core i7 versus Core2 Duo versus Other (maybe cell)?
Core i7 should have higher memory
This may be a somewhat banal question, but what would be the optimal
hardware/software configuration needed to leverage the power of
gnuradio?
Core i7 versus Core2 Duo versus Other (maybe cell)?
64-bit Linux versus 32?
Any hardware acceleration/DSP cards?
Amount/type of RAM?
While running some fl
