Hi list,
My name
is Nemanja and I am working on my master thesis trying to implement
802.11g OFDM standard on USRP2 with XCVR2450. In order to meet the
timing requirements of the standard, I want to split the
functionality between the host and the FPGA, very similar to
Split-functionality M
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
>
>
>
> My name
> is Nemanja and I am working on my master thesis trying to implement
> 802.11g OFDM standard on USRP2 with XCVR2450. In order to meet the
> timing requirements of the standard, I want to split the
> fun
Josh and Nick,
thank you very much for your reply.
I have some more things to ask:
> >> 1) The external SRAM is currently used for buffering TX packets
> >>
> >> 2) The existing makefile is really for unix installations. You will have a
> > much easier time compiling your custom image with a L
Hi Nick,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Foster wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
>> 1) Did anybody use this external SRAM
>> on USRP2 before? According to the FAQ page the usual FPGA build is
>> not using it.
>> (http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:15, Nick Foster wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Foster wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
>> >> 1) Did anybody use this external SRAM
>> >> on
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:47 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:15, Nick Foster wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> >> Hi Nick,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Foster wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nem
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nick Foster wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:47 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:15, Nick Foster wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> > >> Hi Nick,
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:50, Nick Foster wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:47 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:15, Nick Foster wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
>> >> Hi Nick,
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Fo
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
> >> 1) Did anybody use this external SRAM
> >> on USRP2 before? According to the FAQ page the usual FPGA bu
Hi list,
I found the way to include the xctlsh in the %PATH%
(http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000549.htm).
However, now I have a new problem. Here is the error I get in the cmd.exe when
I try gmake.
Any help is appreciated!
Best Regards,
Nemanja Trecakov
The error follows below:
-
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 19:40 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I found the way to include the xctlsh in the %PATH%
> (http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000549.htm).
>
> However, now I have a new problem. Here is the error I get in the cmd.exe
> when I try gmake.
>
> Any help is a
Hi again,
> The Makefiles really were designed to work on a Linux-based (Ubuntu, I
> think) install of the Xilinx tools. You are probably going to
> have plenty of grief making them work on Windows.
>
> Also, only a tiny fraction of the people on this list have actually
> modifed the FPGA code th
On 19/08/2011 3:05 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi again,
I am aware of that, but I have to try. Can you suggest any better way?
Get yourself a copy of VirtualBox or VmWare Player for your windows
environment, and do a recent Ubuntu install into it, then
install your Xilinx tools into that. T
On 08/19/2011 12:10 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> On 19/08/2011 3:05 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I am aware of that, but I have to try. Can you suggest any better way?
> Get yourself a copy of VirtualBox or VmWare Player for your windows
> environment, and do a recent Ubuntu ins
On 19/08/2011 3:16 PM, Josh Blum wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:10 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
On 19/08/2011 3:05 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi again,
I am aware of that, but I have to try. Can you suggest any better way?
Get yourself a copy of VirtualBox or VmWare Player for your windows
environme
>
> Im fairly certain all you need is gnumake to be installed and xtclsh
> from ISE to be in your %PATH%. I have never tried this, but i would be
> happy to help debug it if there is some problem.
>
> -josh
>
Thank you both for your advices.
Josh, in one of the earlier mails you already advised
nu.org
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:36:48 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g OFDM
> PHY and MAC on USRP2
>
>
> >
> > Im fairly certain all you need is gnumake to be installed and xtclsh
> > from ISE to be in your %PATH%
On 08/19/2011 12:53 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
>
> Sorry, I tried the command 'gmake'(not 'gnumake') in command promt while in
> top\usrp2 folder in order to build the image.
> Is this the correct way to run gnumake?
>
On linux, i type "make proj" in the top level directory to make the ise
p
> >
> > Sorry, I tried the command 'gmake'(not 'gnumake') in command promt while in
> > top\usrp2 folder in order to build the image.
> > Is this the correct way to run gnumake?
> >
>
> On linux, i type "make proj" in the top level directory to make the ise
> project file. I'm not sure what the
lp
Patrik
- Original Message -
From: "Nemanja Trecakov"
To: ;
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 0:13
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Split-function implementation of 802.11g
OFDM PHY and MAC on USRP2
>
> Sorry, I tried the command 'gmake'(not 'gnumake
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:16:01 -0700, Josh Blum wrote:
Im fairly certain all you need is gnumake to be installed and xtclsh
from ISE to be in your %PATH%. I have never tried this, but i would
be
happy to help debug it if there is some problem.
Evidently one also needs 'head' as well:
http://g
Hi list,
Thank you for your response!
>You must tell your windows where your make/gmake is by setting the
>environment variable PATH
>to C:\Program Files\GnuWin32\bin (in your case)
@Patrik & Josh: I added this to my path, and this helped. Now is
'make/gmake'-command recognizable.
>Evide
>
> @Josh: Yes, this was indeed the problem. I tried to change the line,
> but then I got a new error 'missing separator. Stop.’ which means
> that there were some irregular spaces between the commands in the
> file. After many rounds with trying to find out what is wrong and
> reading in the mak
> I made a simple rule to print the sources and they appear to be correct.
> I suspect the secondary expansion is messed up, try this diff:
> http://pastebin.com/hcrfCVse
>
> -josh
>
You are a real magician :)
I followed your advice and deleted one $ sign in the two lines:
-$(ISE_FILE): $$(SOU
There is one more thing which I didn't mention before, which can have some
influence of the build-result:
The Xilinx ISE 12.4 version for Windows which I am using is a copy which I got
from the university's engineer. However, if I want to use all of the Xilinx
functins, I have to connect to a
> >
> > ERROR:TclTasksC:xfile_070: File(s) "./)" cannot be found
>
> Undo your previous changes to the makefile.srcs
I changed all the makefile.srcs to the original form, but a new error occurs:
Error output:
--
C:\USRP2_fpga_NEMO\usrp2\top\USRP2>make
proc
Hi list,
now I got a Linux copy of Xilinx 12.4 and I tried to build the UHD fpga image
on ubuntu 10.04. with uhd version: UHD_003.001.002-ba0e3c8
I added the .bashrc to include xtclsh like this:
#Include Xilix xtclsh in te path in order to be able to build FPGA images!
XILINX_ROOT=/opt/Xilinx/1
Hi list,
I am pretty sure I know what is the problem. After reading the installation
manual
(http://www.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/SW_Docs_Redirect/sw_docs_redirect?ver=12.4&locale=en&topic=release+notes),
I found out that I did not appropriately set the environment variables. It
should be done with
On 08/30/2011 05:15 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi list,
I am pretty sure I know what is the problem. After reading the
installation manual
(http://www.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/SW_Docs_Redirect/sw_docs_redirect?ver=12.4&locale=en&topic=release+notes),
I found out that I did not appropriately set th
>This is wandering very far away from the core topic of Gnu Radio,
and into "help with Xilinx Tools". You *may* find people on this
list who
>can help you, just by pure blind luck, or maybe not.
>
>From the looks of it, and I'm no TCL expert, it looks like it was
unable to c
On 08/30/2011 07:19 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Marcus, you were right - I did install the Xilinx ISE being root.
However, when I tried to run the same command being root, the bash did
not find the xtclsh.
The next thing I did is to include the xtclsh into the PATH in
.bashrc, but for root t
>Doing anything other than *what is absolutely necessary* as *root*
is a bad idea. Poor form. Entirely-ordinary things like compiling
code
>should always be done as a regular user. Learn to use and
understand Unix ownership/permissions rules, so you don't end up in
sill
On 08/30/2011 07:45 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
>Doing anything other than *what is absolutely necessary* as *root* is
a bad idea. Poor form. Entirely-ordinary things like compiling code
>should always be done as a regular user. Learn to use and understand
Unix ownership/permissions rules,
>sudo chown -R your-user-id whatever-your-directory-is
Owner of the directories changed :)
>Don't think of the computer/OS as an obstacle that gets in the way
of what you're doing. Think of it as a long-term partner.
>You should think of a new computer/operating-system as a
Hi Folks,
I find this discussion interesting and would like to ask a few questions.
>I FIND THAT THE TWO FPGA IMAGES ARE DIFFERENT.
What do you mean by different? Do they behave different? Or you used a program
to compare the binary data comparison between the 2 and this is what you are
saying
35 matches
Mail list logo
