Hi Folks,
I find this discussion interesting and would like to ask a few questions.
I FIND THAT THE TWO FPGA IMAGES ARE DIFFERENT.
What do you mean by different? Do they behave different? Or you used a program
to compare the binary data comparison between the 2 and this is what you are
saying
Hi list,
now I got a Linux copy of Xilinx 12.4 and I tried to build the UHD fpga image
on ubuntu 10.04. with uhd version: UHD_003.001.002-ba0e3c8
I added the .bashrc to include xtclsh like this:
#Include Xilix xtclsh in te path in order to be able to build FPGA images!
Hi list,
I am pretty sure I know what is the problem. After reading the installation
manual
(http://www.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/SW_Docs_Redirect/sw_docs_redirect?ver=12.4locale=entopic=release+notes),
I found out that I did not appropriately set the environment variables. It
should be done with
On 08/30/2011 05:15 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi list,
I am pretty sure I know what is the problem. After reading the
installation manual
(http://www.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/SW_Docs_Redirect/sw_docs_redirect?ver=12.4locale=entopic=release+notes),
I found out that I did not appropriately set the
This is wandering very far away from the core topic of Gnu Radio,
and into help with Xilinx Tools. You *may* find people on this
list who
can help you, just by pure blind luck, or maybe not.
From the looks of it, and I'm no TCL expert, it looks like it was
unable to create
On 08/30/2011 07:19 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Marcus, you were right - I did install the Xilinx ISE being root.
However, when I tried to run the same command being root, the bash did
not find the xtclsh.
The next thing I did is to include the xtclsh into the PATH in
.bashrc, but for root
Doing anything other than *what is absolutely necessary* as *root*
is a bad idea. Poor form. Entirely-ordinary things like compiling
code
should always be done as a regular user. Learn to use and
understand Unix ownership/permissions rules, so you don't end up in
silly
On 08/30/2011 07:45 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Doing anything other than *what is absolutely necessary* as *root* is
a bad idea. Poor form. Entirely-ordinary things like compiling code
should always be done as a regular user. Learn to use and understand
Unix ownership/permissions rules,
sudo chown -R your-user-id whatever-your-directory-is
Owner of the directories changed :)
Don't think of the computer/OS as an obstacle that gets in the way
of what you're doing. Think of it as a long-term partner.
You should think of a new computer/operating-system as
Hi list,
Thank you for your response!
You must tell your windows where your make/gmake is by setting the
environment variable PATH
to C:\Program Files\GnuWin32\bin (in your case)
@Patrik Josh: I added this to my path, and this helped. Now is
'make/gmake'-command recognizable.
Evidently
@Josh: Yes, this was indeed the problem. I tried to change the line,
but then I got a new error 'missing separator. Stop.’ which means
that there were some irregular spaces between the commands in the
file. After many rounds with trying to find out what is wrong and
reading in the
I made a simple rule to print the sources and they appear to be correct.
I suspect the secondary expansion is messed up, try this diff:
http://pastebin.com/hcrfCVse
-josh
You are a real magician :)
I followed your advice and deleted one $ sign in the two lines:
-$(ISE_FILE): $$(SOURCES)
There is one more thing which I didn't mention before, which can have some
influence of the build-result:
The Xilinx ISE 12.4 version for Windows which I am using is a copy which I got
from the university's engineer. However, if I want to use all of the Xilinx
functins, I have to connect to
ERROR:TclTasksC:xfile_070: File(s) ./) cannot be found
Undo your previous changes to the makefile.srcs
I changed all the makefile.srcs to the original form, but a new error occurs:
Error output:
--
C:\USRP2_fpga_NEMO\usrp2\top\USRP2make
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:16:01 -0700, Josh Blum wrote:
Im fairly certain all you need is gnumake to be installed and xtclsh
from ISE to be in your %PATH%. I have never tried this, but i would
be
happy to help debug it if there is some problem.
Evidently one also needs 'head' as well:
Hi list,
I found the way to include the xctlsh in the %PATH%
(http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000549.htm).
However, now I have a new problem. Here is the error I get in the cmd.exe when
I try gmake.
Any help is appreciated!
Best Regards,
Nemanja Trecakov
The error follows below:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 19:40 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi list,
I found the way to include the xctlsh in the %PATH%
(http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000549.htm).
However, now I have a new problem. Here is the error I get in the cmd.exe
when I try gmake.
Any help is
Hi again,
The Makefiles really were designed to work on a Linux-based (Ubuntu, I
think) install of the Xilinx tools. You are probably going to
have plenty of grief making them work on Windows.
Also, only a tiny fraction of the people on this list have actually
modifed the FPGA code
On 19/08/2011 3:05 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi again,
I am aware of that, but I have to try. Can you suggest any better way?
Get yourself a copy of VirtualBox or VmWare Player for your windows
environment, and do a recent Ubuntu install into it, then
install your Xilinx tools into that.
On 08/19/2011 12:10 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
On 19/08/2011 3:05 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi again,
I am aware of that, but I have to try. Can you suggest any better way?
Get yourself a copy of VirtualBox or VmWare Player for your windows
environment, and do a recent Ubuntu install
On 19/08/2011 3:16 PM, Josh Blum wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:10 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
On 19/08/2011 3:05 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi again,
I am aware of that, but I have to try. Can you suggest any better way?
Get yourself a copy of VirtualBox or VmWare Player for your windows
Im fairly certain all you need is gnumake to be installed and xtclsh
from ISE to be in your %PATH%. I have never tried this, but i would be
happy to help debug it if there is some problem.
-josh
Thank you both for your advices.
Josh, in one of the earlier mails you already advised me to
Sorry, I tried the command 'gmake'(not 'gnumake') in command promt while in
top\usrp2 folder in order to build the image.
Is this the correct way to run gnumake?
Thanks
From: trecakov...@hotmail.com
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 19 Aug
On 08/19/2011 12:53 PM, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Sorry, I tried the command 'gmake'(not 'gnumake') in command promt while in
top\usrp2 folder in order to build the image.
Is this the correct way to run gnumake?
On linux, i type make proj in the top level directory to make the ise
project
Sorry, I tried the command 'gmake'(not 'gnumake') in command promt while in
top\usrp2 folder in order to build the image.
Is this the correct way to run gnumake?
On linux, i type make proj in the top level directory to make the ise
project file. I'm not sure what the binary is
Nemanja,
'make' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
You must tell your windows where your make/gmake is by setting the
environment variable PATH
to C:\Program Files\GnuWin32\bin (in your case)
Type path /? in cmd.exe for help
Patrik
Hi Nick,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
1) Did anybody use this external SRAM
on USRP2 before? According to the FAQ page the usual FPGA build is
not using it.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:15, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
1) Did anybody use this
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:47 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:15, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Sat, Aug 13,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:50, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:47 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:15, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:00 +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:41, Nick Foster n...@ettus.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
1) Did anybody use this external SRAM
on USRP2 before? According to the FAQ page the usual
Josh and Nick,
thank you very much for your reply.
I have some more things to ask:
1) The external SRAM is currently used for buffering TX packets
2) The existing makefile is really for unix installations. You will have a
much easier time compiling your custom image with a Linux ISE
Hi list,
My name
is Nemanja and I am working on my master thesis trying to implement
802.11g OFDM standard on USRP2 with XCVR2450. In order to meet the
timing requirements of the standard, I want to split the
functionality between the host and the FPGA, very similar to
Split-functionality
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 23:26 +0100, Nemanja Trecakov wrote:
Hi list,
My name
is Nemanja and I am working on my master thesis trying to implement
802.11g OFDM standard on USRP2 with XCVR2450. In order to meet the
timing requirements of the standard, I want to split the
functionality
34 matches
Mail list logo
