SV: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-06-08 Thread Patrik Eliardsson
trik and Ulrika Från: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+patrik.eliardsson=foi...@gnu.org [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+patrik.eliardsson=foi...@gnu.org] För Douglas Geiger Skickat: den 8 juni 2009 15:08 Till: Ulrika Uppman Kopia: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Ämne: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-06-08 Thread Douglas Geiger
How are you starting the streaming samples from the two USRP2's? The default start_rx_streaming call (and thus, the standard usrp2_source block) just starts streaming when it receives the command from the host PC. So any delay between when each USRP2 receives the command over the gig-E interface m

SV: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-06-08 Thread Ulrika Uppman
Ettus [mailto:m...@ettus.com] Skickat: den 14 maj 2009 19:07 Till: Ulrika Uppman Kopia: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Ämne: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s Ulrika Uppman wrote: > Hi, > > We've set up a test comparing a recieved white noise signal recieved > by two us

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-05-14 Thread Matt Ettus
Ulrika Uppman wrote: Hi, We've set up a test comparing a recieved white noise signal recieved by two usrp2 recievers. The two receivers were clocked (1PPS and refclk) by a GPS diciplined OCXO which outpus a 1PPS signal which is phase locked to the 10 MHz reference. The daughterboard was the RFX4

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-05-14 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Juha Vierinen wrote: > Ok. I managed to get a lock only after modifying the firmware. Is > there some example for doing this on the host, I'm just wondering what > I did wrong. Calling: ->config_mimo(MC_WE_LOCK_TO_SMA) ...from your host code usrp2 instance poin

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-05-14 Thread Juha Vierinen
>>  We do call config_mimo(MC_WE_LOCK_TO_SMA) when we set up the usrp2 (before >> the start of receiving). Is clocks_mimo_config() different from >> config_mimo()? > > This is correct.  The host driver has the function call to cause the > USRP2 clock to synchronize with an external reference on t

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-05-14 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Ulrika Uppman wrote: >  We do call config_mimo(MC_WE_LOCK_TO_SMA) when we set up the usrp2 (before > the start of receiving). Is clocks_mimo_config() different from config_mimo()? This is correct. The host driver has the function call to cause the USRP2 clock t

SV: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-05-14 Thread Ulrika Uppman
guess. The firmware used is the built version of 10766. /Ulrika -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Juha Vierinen [mailto:jvier...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 14 maj 2009 12:39 Till: Ulrika Uppman Kopia: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Ämne: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s I was

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-05-14 Thread Juha Vierinen
I was just recently fighting with this, and Matt told me that I have to modify the firmware to get the USRP2 to lock (or at least this is the easiest way to get the lock). Have you modified the firmware yet? You need to add clocks_mimo_config(MC_WE_LOCK_TO_SMA); in the main() function of txrx.c a

[Discuss-gnuradio] Syncrinization of two USRP2s

2009-05-14 Thread Ulrika Uppman
Hi, We've set up a test comparing a recieved white noise signal recieved by two usrp2 recievers. The two receivers were clocked (1PPS and refclk) by a GPS diciplined OCXO which outpus a 1PPS signal which is phase locked to the 10 MHz reference. The daughterboard was the RFX400 configured with a