Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-07 Thread Manu T S
Hi, The difference could be because of the way the encoding is implemented. My encoding scheme is very naive. And it need ***not*** necessarily be true that the last K bits are the data bits. Here it happened, but the encoder does not have anything to make sure of this in general. If the decoder i

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-07 Thread ikjtel
OK here is my next question :-) One of the other parity codes in P25 TDMA known as "ISCH" is a similar "binary code" which the specs decribe as follows: The Information field in the ISCH is 40 bits encoded with a (40, 9,16) binary code.The (40, 9,16) code derived from a (40,10,16) binary code

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-07 Thread ikjtel
> Now I'm wondering why I didn't get any segmentation faults. You should be able to reproduce this by loading the alist file from the reference site http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/mackay/codes/alist.html    (that example may not be a good LDPC example, but should at minimum cause a fault in u

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-06 Thread Miklos Maroti
Wow, interesting to read all about this. Thanks for all the good work. Miklos On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Manu T S wrote: > Hi Miklos, > > The implementation is quite slow. I don't have any quantitative performance > measures, yet. > Nevertheless I have some empirical measures. For example, o

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-06 Thread Manu T S
Hi Miklos, The implementation is quite slow. I don't have any quantitative performance measures, yet. Nevertheless I have some empirical measures. For example, on testing the implementation (all C++ and no GNU Radio) with a (8000, 4000) code(rate 0.5, regular), in with AWGN of 0.8 added to it (cap

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-06 Thread Miklos Maroti
Hi Manu, Thanks for the report, it was more informative than the presentation. Yes, I have seen the BER figure, but that is not very will presented (e.g. you should use logarithmic scale for BER) and should have better resolution on the Eb/N0 axes. You write that it does not use VOLK or SSE2. How

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-05 Thread Miklos Maroti
Dear Manu, Do you have any performance numbers on your LDPC decoder? I could not find any info, even in your presentation. Do you have also a BER figure, or even better would be some technical report. I would love to get some sense on the performance of your implementation. Best, Miklos On Tue,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-05 Thread Manu T S
Dear Max, You are correct. It is a bug. Now I'm wondering why I didn't get any segmentation faults. Probably I didn't get any segmentation faults because, after i = M - 1, EOF has reached. Thanks for the correction. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, ikjtel wrote: > Greetings > > I was very int

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-11-05 Thread ikjtel
Greetings I was very interested in this project for possible application to the op25 project, since P25 uses several FEC codes including RS and other block codes.  I've brought up the gr-ldpc library and have a few questions.  Due to the hateful YAhoo mail composer, I'm hesitant to post lengthy

[Discuss-gnuradio] The GSoC project on LDPC codes.

2013-10-07 Thread Manu T S
Hello Everyone, I'm Manu, one of the GSoC student under GNU Radio this year. I worked on LDPC Codes, mentored by Jens. Another GSoC student Tracie also worked on LDPC Codes this summer. We both worked such that there is minimum duplicates and both our work complemented each other. As the final ou