On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:44:21AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:58:17PM -0400, Erich Stuntebeck wrote:
> > The daughterboard gain was set to the mid-point.
> >
> > I don't have the range of the time domain samples as I did the FFT
> > processing in real-time and discard
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:58:17PM -0400, Erich Stuntebeck wrote:
> The daughterboard gain was set to the mid-point.
>
> I don't have the range of the time domain samples as I did the FFT
> processing in real-time and discarded the raw data. The data was
> collected using a script I wrote to li
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:43:56PM -0400, Erich Stuntebeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to calibrate the USRP so I can get true dBm readings out of
> it. I'm using an LFRX card with 16 decimation and a center frequency
> of 2 MHz so I can look at the range from DC - 4 MHz. I hooked up a
> signal ge
On Thursday 19 March 2009 22:43:56 Erich Stuntebeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to calibrate the USRP so I can get true dBm readings out of
> it. I'm using an LFRX card with 16 decimation and a center frequency
> of 2 MHz so I can look at the range from DC - 4 MHz. I hooked up a
> signal generator
Hi,
I'm trying to calibrate the USRP so I can get true dBm readings out of
it. I'm using an LFRX card with 16 decimation and a center frequency
of 2 MHz so I can look at the range from DC - 4 MHz. I hooked up a
signal generator and swept it through the DC - 4 MHz range at 100 kHz
intervals and gen
