Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2012-02-28 Thread Gaetano Mendola
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Michael Dickens m...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Dec 13, 2010, at 7:33 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: The biggest problem that I see with cmake is that the burden of proof lies with cmake. I'm 100% confident that CMake, or QMake for that matter (and, I'm sure, BJam and

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2010-12-13 Thread Andrea Montefusco
On 12/13/2010 01:51 AM, Josh Blum wrote: 2) A build from git source would be the same as a build from a release tarball (because we just tar.gz'd up the source tree itself). So in a sense, it provides a build uniformity. This is a good point. Ok, back to the books again, I will give it a try

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2010-12-13 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Josh Blum j...@joshknows.com wrote: Hey list, I would like to share my experiences with CMake. I started using CMake because I needed a cross-platform build system for making UHD and I stumbled upon CMake. After learning CMake and building UHD on-top of it,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2010-12-13 Thread Josh Blum
The biggest problem that I see with cmake is that the burden of proof lies with cmake. We have years of building up the project configuration in autotools and every problem we have come across has been solvable and solved in this framework. While some/many of these problems might have been

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Dickens
On Dec 13, 2010, at 7:33 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: The biggest problem that I see with cmake is that the burden of proof lies with cmake. I'm 100% confident that CMake, or QMake for that matter (and, I'm sure, BJam and other build tools), could handle the GNU Radio build system robustly if

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2010-12-12 Thread Andrea Montefusco
Josh, First off, many thanks for share your experience with the list. Studying the cmake a little, I found that it is remarkably simpler than Autotools, at least for my small projects. However I would like to stress a point about the source packages. The Autotools suite produces source

[Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2010-12-11 Thread Josh Blum
Hey list, I would like to share my experiences with CMake. I started using CMake because I needed a cross-platform build system for making UHD and I stumbled upon CMake. After learning CMake and building UHD on-top of it, I can conclude that CMake is indeed awesome.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] an example of a gnuradio project using cmake

2010-12-11 Thread Elvis Dowson
Hi Josh, The original makers of CMake kitware initially built it for the visualization tool kit library (VTK). Its pretty good at generating cross platform build configurations, plus IDE based configurations for Xcode, Visual Studio, etc. Elvis Dowson