On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Richard Bell
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I read that page before making my post, and that's what lead me to
> conclude the symbol map wasn't working as intended. I ran a test by
> changing the symbol map array [0, 1, 3, 2] vs [1, 0, 3, 2] and noticed the
> output didn't
Hi Tom,
I read that page before making my post, and that's what lead me to conclude the
symbol map wasn't working as intended. I ran a test by changing the symbol map
array [0, 1, 3, 2] vs [1, 0, 3, 2] and noticed the output didn't change. Only
changing the constellation point order made a chan
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Richard Bell
wrote:
> The symbol map feature of the constellation object doesn't seem to do
> anything. In fact, you can leave it blank. The index of the constellation
> points is used to map the complex points to bits. The documentation leads
> one to believe othe
The symbol map feature of the constellation object doesn't seem to do
anything. In fact, you can leave it blank. The index of the constellation
points is used to map the complex points to bits. The documentation leads
one to believe otherwise. Working as intended?
v/r,
Rich
___
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Martin Braun wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Ben Reynwar wrote:
>> > You've got that right: a soft decider doesn't really decide, but rather
>> > gives a value how good the estimate is. Say you have a binary output,
>> > 1 and -1. A soft decider
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Ben Reynwar wrote:
> > You've got that right: a soft decider doesn't really decide, but rather
> > gives a value how good the estimate is. Say you have a binary output,
> > 1 and -1. A soft decider can also give any value in between. If you get
> > a 0, the
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Martin Braun wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:55:30AM -0700, Ben Reynwar wrote:
>> I'm new to all this, so I don't have a good handle on soft versus hard
>> decision making. My understanding is that a hard decision maker
>> simply returns the symbol value, and
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:55:30AM -0700, Ben Reynwar wrote:
> I'm new to all this, so I don't have a good handle on soft versus hard
> decision making. My understanding is that a hard decision maker
> simply returns the symbol value, and a soft decision maker would
> return probabilities for vari
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Ben Reynwar wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Ben Reynwar wrote:
Hi all,
What do people think of introducing a constellation ob
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Ben Reynwar wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Ben Reynwar wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> What do people think of introducing a constellation object into gnuradio?
>>>
>>> It would hold the constellation
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Ben Reynwar wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> What do people think of introducing a constellation object into gnuradio?
>>
>> It would hold the constellation points and also a decision-making function.
>> New modulations
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Ben Reynwar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do people think of introducing a constellation object into gnuradio?
>
> It would hold the constellation points and also a decision-making function.
> New modulations could then be easily created by subclassing a constellation.
Hi all,
What do people think of introducing a constellation object into gnuradio?
It would hold the constellation points and also a decision-making function.
New modulations could then be easily created by subclassing a constellation.
It would also mean that the decision-making function for a gi
13 matches
Mail list logo
