On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 08:12 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:02:13AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > The 2.x gr-atsc seems to be closer to working, at least the flow control
> > (forecast,consume,etc) creates the exact to-the-byte correct quantity of
> > output with no loss of
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 08:12 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:02:13AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > The 2.x gr-atsc seems to be closer to working, at least the flow control
> > (forecast,consume,etc) creates the exact to-the-byte correct quantity of
> > output with no loss of
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:02:13AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> The 2.x gr-atsc seems to be closer to working, at least the flow control
> (forecast,consume,etc) creates the exact to-the-byte correct quantity of
> output with no loss of sync (since it keys on easy to discern -5/+5), on
> 120MB size
The 2.x gr-atsc seems to be closer to working, at least the flow control
(forecast,consume,etc) creates the exact to-the-byte correct quantity of
output with no loss of sync (since it keys on easy to discern -5/+5), on
120MB size output files.
However the *quality* of the output is only about 65 p
