On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Anderson, Douglas J.
wrote:
> https://github.com/kit-cel/gr-lte/blob/master/docs/lte_cp_ffo_sync_hier.grc.png
>
> If I understand that right, it's saying that I actually don't need to retune
> the USRP, it just pumps samples into the input of the FFO Sync hier bloc
Douglas J. [dander...@its.bldrdoc.gov]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:04 PM
To: Johannes Demel; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-lte vs gr::digital::ofdm*
Johannes,
I really appreciate the response, I know you're busy with your SOCIS project.
I'm actu
behalf of
Johannes Demel [uf...@student.kit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 9:15 AM
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-lte vs gr::digital::ofdm*
Hey Doug,
there are a few differences between gr-ofdm and gr-lte. When I started
the project, gr-ofdm wasn't ava
Hey Doug,
there are a few differences between gr-ofdm and gr-lte. When I started
the project, gr-ofdm wasn't available. Later on I tried to use an API
as similar as possible to gr-ofdm. Though, gr-lte is designed for FDD
mode. That being said, it is quite a difference to gr-ofdm which is
primarily
On 24.06.2015 08:48, Anderson, Douglas J. wrote:
> Lately I've been working with gr-lte and trying to use some of those
> blocks in my own application (not grc).
>
> I'm still in the learning phase about ofdm/lte, and I'm struggling with
> the lack of documentation or comments in gr-lte.
>
> I th
Hi all,
Lately I've been working with gr-lte and trying to use some of those blocks in
my own application (not grc).
I'm still in the learning phase about ofdm/lte, and I'm struggling with the
lack of documentation or comments in gr-lte.
I think I would prefer to use GNU Radio's built-in OFDM
