Hello
This is for Matt.
I'm not aware about USRP requirement's history, hence I'm asking.
I apologise immediately if the question is stupid enough... :-)
have you ever think about a simplified USRP, or 1/2 USRP, having only 1 side TX
and RX?
Would it make a cost difference (maybe on a large
Hi Alberto,
the USRP2 is only 1xTX and 1xRX. However, the USRP2 costs more than
the USRP1 because of its bigger FPGA and faster ADC/DAC (in addition
to SDRAM and other hardware). In short, the cost savings are minimal
if you would remove one RX and one TX from the USRP1 (you might be
able to
have you ever think about a simplified USRP, or 1/2 USRP, having only 1 side
TX and RX?
Would it make a cost difference (maybe on a large volume basis)? Would it
save some space?
Reason for asking is that many (most?) applications are 1+1 channel, and
saving space may allow more compact
have you ever think about a simplified USRP, or 1/2 USRP, having only 1 side
TX and RX?
How about a 64 x USRP? It would be cool if there was a USRP that had
many receiver channels, and it would also have a simple beam-former
built into the FPGA.
All of the schematics for the USRP and
