Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] portaudio sink, partial succes on windows WARNING

2006-03-21 Thread Robert McGwier
Yes, I believe you are killing the pa threads with this small latency request. I should have remembered this for Windows. In the current sink code, the buffer and latency request are based on 21.3 ms. For Windows MME, this should be at least 100ms on your first try. Be careful and alwa

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] portaudio sink, partial succes on windows

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Dvh
Robert McGwier wrote: > This is excellent news. I can't believe we have only been attempting > this for a little over a week. It will improve. > > Please change the 10.66 ms interval in check_topology UPWARDS until > the crackling stops. I am sure you are not able to handle 11 msec > laten

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] portaudio sink, partial succes on windows

2006-03-20 Thread Robert McGwier
This is excellent news. I can't believe we have only been attempting this for a little over a week. It will improve. Please change the 10.66 ms interval in check_topology UPWARDS until the crackling stops. I am sure you are not able to handle 11 msec latency with wmme. You will be luc

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] portaudio sink, partial succes on windows

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Dvh
Robert McGwier wrote: Thanks to tons of grunt work by Eric, we have used the highly tuned ring buffers in the audio_portaudio_sink code and it functions nicely with a little bit of operator help.I can now get solid performance on all Linux hosts with the example code mono_tone_portaudio