On 12/12/2011 06:56 PM, Paul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 05:19:13PM -0800, Josh Blum wrote:
>> Its weird that feval works ok, I tried for a bit, but I couldnt figure
>> out what was different about my blocks. This will take more effort to
>> figure out if thats possible, but I do thin
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 05:19:13PM -0800, Josh Blum wrote:
> Its weird that feval works ok, I tried for a bit, but I couldnt figure
> out what was different about my blocks. This will take more effort to
> figure out if thats possible, but I do think its a bug in swig.
Well, let me know if I can h
On 12/12/2011 05:10 PM, Paul Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Josh Blum wrote:
>> I cant say yet as to why, but at least its reproducible.
>
> I spent a few hours source diving today and gdb-stepping. I
> could not figure it out, but I did find that it's broken in every
> min
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Josh Blum wrote:
> I cant say yet as to why, but at least its reproducible.
I spent a few hours source diving today and gdb-stepping. I
could not figure it out, but I did find that it's broken in every
minor release after 2.0.1 (2.0.2, 3 and 4).
I finally gave u
> I definitely wonder if it's my swig. Can you try under Swig
> 2.0.4 on your end?
>
swig 2.01 from ubuntu 11.10 repo was ok
swig 2.04 from source had the same failure
I cant say yet as to why, but at least its reproducible.
-josh
___
Discuss-gnu
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:54:43PM -0800, Josh Blum wrote:
> So it looks like everything else passed which included gr_feval (another
> thing in gnuradio-core that uses swig directors).
Yes, indeed sir, that happened.
Start 22: qa_feval 22/92
Test #22: qa_feval .
On 12/06/2011 06:39 PM, Paul Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:44:17PM -0800, Josh Blum wrote:
>> Whats your OS? I have tested it on a few recent ubuntus and fedoras, and
>> windows with a recent boost.
>
> Arch. Everything is wacky new because of rolling release. It's
> super easy to
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:44:17PM -0800, Josh Blum wrote:
> Whats your OS? I have tested it on a few recent ubuntus and fedoras, and
> windows with a recent boost.
Arch. Everything is wacky new because of rolling release. It's
super easy to get going if you build a test box, and I will
happily
On 12/05/2011 06:40 PM, Paul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:30:17AM -0800, Josh Blum wrote:
>> Looks like I had a typo in the forecast call, fix is pushed. I should
>> have had unit testing for the general_work as well.
>> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/jblum.git/log/?h=python_blocks
>
> C
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:30:17AM -0800, Josh Blum wrote:
> Looks like I had a typo in the forecast call, fix is pushed. I should
> have had unit testing for the general_work as well.
> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/jblum.git/log/?h=python_blocks
Compiled!
> I dont really know if thats the cause of t
On 12/04/2011 07:14 PM, Paul Miller wrote:
>
> I have built a really simple block for testing purposes…
>
> When I run it, I get segmentation faults and source diving has
> not revealed the problem to me — there's a lot of code there, too
> much for me it seems.
>
> Am I doing something so hor
I have built a really simple block for testing purposes…
When I run it, I get segmentation faults and source diving has
not revealed the problem to me — there's a lot of code there, too
much for me it seems.
Am I doing something so horribly wrong?
The build I'm using from jbuml's git:
* jblu
12 matches
Mail list logo
