On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Brett L. Trotter wrote:
> I have a loop block that I wanted to run very slow (1Hz), and put a
> throttle block set to rate 1. Unfortunately, it seems to tear through
> the first 8-9k samples in a blink before it slows down. Is there an
> alternative implementation o
I have a loop block that I wanted to run very slow (1Hz), and put a
throttle block set to rate 1. Unfortunately, it seems to tear through
the first 8-9k samples in a blink before it slows down. Is there an
alternative implementation of the throttle block that would work at very
slow speeds? Perhaps
