On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Douglas Geiger
wrote:
> 2.) I do see the value of some of the more recent Q&A type websites.
> In particular I'll point to stackoverflow (and the related
> stackexchange set of websites) as an excellent repository of knowledge
> that excels at building a community.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Matt Ettus wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 10:47 AM, Dan Harasty wrote:
>>
>> Hello, all.
>>
>> OK, I know I'm just the "new guy" here, and it may be poor form to
>> suggest that a well established forum should change its ways
>>
>> But I find the email-based discussion
On 09/02/2010 10:47 AM, Dan Harasty wrote:
Hello, all.
OK, I know I'm just the "new guy" here, and it may be poor form to
suggest that a well established forum should change its ways
But I find the email-based discussion list VERY inefficient.
A lot of people on here seem to use Nabble
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:47:34PM -0400, Dan Harasty wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> OK, I know I'm just the "new guy" here, and it may be poor form to
> suggest that a well established forum should change its ways
:-)
> But I find the email-based discussion list VERY inefficient.
> - any sense o
Dan,
Other than the difficulty of setting up and maintaining the site, I think
it's a fabulous idea!
Then again, I'm just as new as you are, but in general I think it would be
*way* better. Especially for new folks jumping in and learning all the past
body of knowledge.
-William
On Thu, Sep 2, 20
Hello, all.
OK, I know I'm just the "new guy" here, and it may be poor form to
suggest that a well established forum should change its ways
But I find the email-based discussion list VERY inefficient.
- any sense of "threading" of a conversation is lost (at least for me: I
receive the "d
