Hi Marcus,
Sorry for responding lately. I got it, thanks your reply
在 2015年06月20日 23:05, Marcus Müller 写道:
But I don't know why do it can increase parallelism?
Assume the following situation
file_source- multiply_const - file_sink
assume the complete file fits into the buffer, and n_best
But I don't know why do it can increase parallelism?
Assume the following situation
file_source- multiply_const - file_sink
assume the complete file fits into the buffer, and n_best wouldn't be
buffer/2, then file_source would read the whole file, and write it to
the buffer. Only then,
Hi Tom, Johnathan,
Thanks your reply.
Hi Marcus,
Seems your conclusion is make sense.
I think it might relate with buffer size which was allocated in
flat_flowgraph.cc / allocate_buffer
// *2 because we're now only filling them 1/2 way in order to
// increase the available
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Tiankun Hu tiankun...@foxmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks your reply, I have another question, in function
min_available_space why buffer_size/2 is best ?
I'm not really sure. That's a question for Eric.
What happens when you change it? How does it affect
Hi Tiankun, Hi Tom,
I vaguely remember me wondering about that line. It comes from the
single threaded scheduler; back then, wondering, I came to the
conclusion that for the STS that it's probably been considered useful to
half the the buffer usage ripple that could occur when blocks started
to
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Tom Rondeau t...@trondeau.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Tiankun Hu tiankun...@foxmail.com
wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks your reply, I have another question, in function
min_available_space why buffer_size/2 is best ?
I'm not really sure. That's a
Hi Tom,
Thanks your reply, I have another question, in function
min_available_space why buffer_size/2 is best ?
在 2015年06月16日 21:31, Tom Rondeau 写道:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Tiankun Hu tiankun...@foxmail.com
mailto:tiankun...@foxmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After go through the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Tiankun Hu tiankun...@foxmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After go through the block_executor.cc, I found alignment feature work
only when output_multiple not set, why them can not work at the same time?
--
Thanks
Tiankun
Because they are competing objectives. The
Hi,
After go through the block_executor.cc, I found alignment feature work
only when output_multiple not set, why them can not work at the same time?
--
Thanks
Tiankun
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
