re doing it the right way - but would need to confirm with Travis
-Robin
-Original Message-
From: Glen Langston
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 4:39 PM
To: Getz, Robin
Cc: Marcus D. Leech ; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Gnuradio for Raspberry PI 4 and SDRPLay works well
Hi Robin,
When using the AIRSPY (and mini) this summer I was finding some flashes in the
RF band that
were on for a few 100 micro-seconds, then off. (The plots are on my home
computer so I’ll
have to send these on Friday). The fraction of time the flashes are on is
very small, less
than a to
On Friday, November 15, 2019 1:22 PM , Glen I Langston wrote:
[snip]
> I’ve not yet fully checked the SDRPlay for short term transients.
>
>Note that the Pluto SDR has no (or at least few) short term transients in the
>RF.
> I did find the AIRSPY did have some transients that seem to be due to the
Hi Marcus,
Two good things about the SDRplay, now that the gnuradio interface seems
to be working, are:
1) Very high gain. I need about 30 dB of IF attenuation to get the levels
right.
2) Very good data transfer rates. Right now I appear to be getting 100% of
the 7 MHz samples
delivered to
On 11/15/2019 09:17 AM, Glen I Langston wrote:
Thank for your help Chris,
I have now gotten the SDRPlay connected to my telescope
and the results are looking reasonable.
My initial problems were with the sense of the gain values, which
are actually attenuation values for the SDRPlay.
It seems
Thank for your help Chris,
I have now gotten the SDRPlay connected to my telescope
and the results are looking reasonable.
My initial problems were with the sense of the gain values, which
are actually attenuation values for the SDRPlay.
It seems like the defaults are reasonable, and that probab
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:35:13 +
Chris Vine wrote:
> The original poster can get some information from installing soapy and
> doing 'SoapySDRUtil --probe'.
I should probably have appended what the probe tells me about my RSP1A,
which may or may not apply to his:
---
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:11:22 +
Müller, Marcus (CEL) wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
> first of all: This email nearly eluded my attention – you replied to a
> completely different topic, and that means email clients will sort your
> mail under the "Simulated Time?" thread. Simply don't reply to emails
>
Hi Glen,
On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 09:22 -0500, Glen I Langston wrote:
> Thanks Marcus,
>
> Concerning your points, I thought I’d edited the Subject line to
> start a new thread. I’ll be more careful in the future.
>
no worries – just the danger of hiding your own threads!
> Also thanks for your
Thanks Marcus,
Concerning your points, I thought I’d edited the Subject line to
start a new thread. I’ll be more careful in the future.
Also thanks for your clarification of the source code origin. I’ve also
directly contacted the folks at SDRPlay.
I do think the SDRPlay folks do want to be mo
Hi Glen,
first of all: This email nearly eluded my attention – you replied to a
completely different topic, and that means email clients will sort your
mail under the "Simulated Time?" thread. Simply don't reply to emails
if you don't mean to actually reply.
Then: The SDRPlay block isn't part of
11 matches
Mail list logo