From: Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Deqiang chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:52:54 -0700
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 07:38:32PM +, Deqiang chen wrote:
&g
note that I actually want to realize an eye diagram.
And the previous email is how I like to realize it.
Does anyone have others ways to realize an eye diagram?
From: "Deqiang chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnura
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 07:38:32PM +, Deqiang chen wrote:
> Thanks, guys!
> Now I have another problem about how to use split the dat stream.
> I would like to split a data stream, put it into parallel streams and
> show these streams on
> screen. Note that I would like to show these data stre
Thanks, guys!
Now I have another problem about how to use split the dat stream.
I would like to split a data stream, put it into parallel streams and show
these streams on
screen. Note that I would like to show these data streams together in a
single window.
Could any one give me a hint about how
Quoting Deqiang chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hello, Eric,
>
> I remembered there is an annoucement that FSK can work at 100kbps.
> So I dig it out and take a look at the source code for the FSK ( fsk_rx.py)
> . I am a little surprised
> that there are no time recovery there. My understanding is tha
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:53:10PM +0100, Stephane Fillod wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:59:00AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> > The primary bottleneck is in the rx path and is in the generic (C++)
> > implemenation of gr_fir_ccf. We could use a SIMD version
> > of this filter primitive (an
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:59:00AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
> Matt and I spent some time looking at the FSK code over the weekend.
[...]
nice!
> The primary bottleneck is in the rx path and is in the generic (C++)
> implemenation of gr_fir_ccf. We could use a SIMD version
> of this filter pri
