On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:44, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> >
> > I read a bit of Apple docs and figured out how loading from nibs is done.
> I
> > added support in Zcode, and prepared a patch for GNUstep GUI. It's
> clumsy
> > but works for my needs.
>
> I submitted a patch similar to yours. This class
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 20:20, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
> That's what I was suggesting a couple email ago, using a svn checkout
> as local (file://) ports tree will get it updated via svn on a "sync"
> action.
> From man page:
> "If any of the ports tree(s) uses a file: URL that points to a local
> s
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Ivan Vučica wrote:
> Is it possible to add something beside file:// and rsync:// repositories
> without requiring people to manually 'svn up' or 'hg pull && hg up'? The
> idea is that any updates get automatically pulled at 'port selfupdate &&
> port upgrade outdat
Hello guys,
Now that the core release is out of the door, a initial release of
DBusKit seemed only fitting, so here it is:
1 GNUstep DBusKit Framework 0.1
***
This is the first public release of DBusKit, the GNUstep D-Bus bindings
framework. The framework allows Objec
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 17:11, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
>
> Of course you can use additional repository in MP.
Is it possible to add something beside file:// and rsync:// repositories
without requiring people to manually 'svn up' or 'hg pull && hg up'? The
idea is that any updates get automatically
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Ivan Vučica wrote:
> This is not what I meant. I meant I want to share stuff with other people.
That's what I got.
> With Debian it is possible to set up an additional repository, which is an
> often used functionality in case a) developers want to share bleedi
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Ivan Vučica wrote:
> What makes it more compelling than pulling out Debian's package sources and
> building from that? :-)
Sources for packages would still have a little delay when compared
with a system that has the ability to fetch from VCS.
--
Andrea
On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:20, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:14, Ivan Vučica wrote:
>
>> I could submit a patch. Would just including objc/objc.h in
>> ObjectiveC2runtime.h be correct?
>
>
> No, absolutely not. runtime.h is designed to be included instead of the GCC
> libobjc head
Hi!
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 15:20, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:14, Ivan Vučica wrote:
>
> > I could submit a patch. Would just including objc/objc.h in
> ObjectiveC2runtime.h be correct?
>
>
> No, absolutely not. runtime.h is designed to be included instead of the
> GCC libobj
> I could submit a patch.
Yes, please - that would be very welcome :-)
Obviously take into account David's comments/suggestions
on how to solve the issue.
Thanks
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l
On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:14, Ivan Vučica wrote:
> I could submit a patch. Would just including objc/objc.h in
> ObjectiveC2runtime.h be correct?
No, absolutely not. runtime.h is designed to be included instead of the GCC
libobjc headers, but includes some guards for the case where it's included
On 15. tra. 2011., at 14:59, "Nicola Pero" > wrote:
I currently have GNUstep installed, but I don't think there's a
conflict at
the moment. I have GCC 4.4.5 installed, and clang 1.1.
You seem to have stumbled upon an untested compiler/runtime
combination (clang +
runtime from GCC 4.4.5)
> I currently have GNUstep installed, but I don't think there's a conflict at
> the moment. I have GCC 4.4.5 installed, and clang 1.1.
You seem to have stumbled upon an untested compiler/runtime combination (clang +
runtime from GCC 4.4.5).
> Compiling file runtime.c ...
> In file included from
I noticed I failed to mention which version I'm using. This is latest SVN of
the core module:
ivucica@theevilmacbook:~/Programs/gnustep/modules/core$ svn info | grep
Revision
Revision: 32865
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:56, Ivan Vučica wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I currently have GNUstep installed, but I d
Hi!
I currently have GNUstep installed, but I don't think there's a conflict at
the moment. I have GCC 4.4.5 installed, and clang 1.1.
Here's what I'm doing. I am forcing use of clang as a compiler, I am telling
GNUstep where to find the runtime (using beautiful trick that Jason Felice
added to Z
Hi!
I've just compiled GnomeTheme from SVN under Debian. I've reconfigured
GNUstep to use clang to compile (which is probably not the same compiler
that is used for building GNUstep .deb packages by the maintainer), but I
believe I used this setup before as well.
Now, as soon as I switch theme to
16 matches
Mail list logo
