On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Doc O'Leary
wrote:
> For your reference, records indicate that
> Dan Hitt wrote:
>
>> Absolutely --- an entire OS which you just install on some partition
>> of a gpt disk
>> would be perfect, imvho.
>>
>> I would certainly download and use it.
>
> For what? I ma
On Feb 17, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Doc O'Leary
wrote:
> Steer GNUstep towards supporting existing ObjC developers that think they
> can benefit from running their software in a non-Apple ecosystem. Purge
> the project of the “what can you do for me?” attitude and welcome people
> with an inviting “w
For your reference, records indicate that
Dan Hitt wrote:
> Absolutely --- an entire OS which you just install on some partition
> of a gpt disk
> would be perfect, imvho.
>
> I would certainly download and use it.
For what? I mainly use a Mac, but I have a number of images for virtual
machin
On 17 Feb 2016, at 23:07, Doc O'Leary wrote:
>
>> Speaking of a vision. What I personally would like to see is a complete OS
>> distro built from the bottom up with GNUstep in mind.
>
> Wrong kind of vision. I’ve always been talking about a vision for how
> *actual* people would find GNUstep u
On 17 Feb 2016, at 19:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:
>
> Why not wayland?
Because it’s a distraction. Wayland can run X11 apps fine. You gain nothing
from Wayland that you wouldn’t have from just dropping support for early '90s
X11 implementations.
> Network transparency is not something wh
on the topic of a gnustep distro has anyone looked at packaging gnustep
for Reactos?
On 18 February 2016 at 16:19, Dan Hitt wrote:
> Absolutely --- an entire OS which you just install on some partition
> of a gpt disk
> would be perfect, imvho.
>
> I would certainly download and use it.
>
>
