I appreciate very much the time taken by those who responded here and
via e-mail. It's done a lot to reassure me and - more importantly -
gives me some good information for people who might look askance at it
when I pitch the solution.
Thanks for helping the newb.
Greg
--
Harry? Ron's voice
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Helge Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07.10.2008, at 19:22, Gregory Weston wrote:
What I'm really looking for is opinions, anecdotes, etc on how stable
and robust the GNUstep version of Foundation is. I know I'm up to it
because I've already done it, but
On 07.10.2008, at 19:22, Gregory Weston wrote:
What I'm really looking for is opinions, anecdotes, etc on how stable
and robust the GNUstep version of Foundation is. I know I'm up to it
because I've already done it, but GNUstep's my unknown. Can I trust
this
as the base for a mid-volume
As long as we're talking about Foundation, I can say with confidence
that it is 100% bullet proof. I'm using it for all sorts of things at my
own company (an ISP), some examples being:
- a distributed SQL-backed web-based network monitoring and management
system capable of monitoring the
On 7 Oct 2008, at 18:22, Gregory Weston wrote:
This is an overly blunt question, but my timeframes right now are
shorter than I'd like. I've used NeXTstep a bit and Cocoa extensively
but I'm new to GNUstep. A client to whom I cannot sell a Mac, but who
has embraced Linux, has approached me to
Message d'origine
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008.10.07 19:22
À: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Objet: Suitability for production code?
This is an overly blunt question, but my timeframes right now are
shorter than I'd like. I've used NeXTstep a bit and Cocoa extensively
but I'm new to
