Free Software Foundation
> www.fsf.org www.gnu.org www.freenode.net
>
> James Carthew wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does GNUstep have a status page similar to:
> > http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/
> > Which outlines the current API status of GNUstep
/Developer/
--
Svetlana A. Tkachenko
Member of the Free Software Foundation
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org www.freenode.net
James Carthew wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does GNUstep have a status page similar to:
> http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/
> Which outlines the current API st
t and share that information.
>
> Regards,
>
> Doug
>
> On Jul 5, 2015, at 4:24 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
>
> > On 5 Jul 2015, at 11:06, James Carthew wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Does GNUstep have a status page similar to:
>
Am 06.07.2015 um 09:28 schrieb David Chisnall :
> On 6 Jul 2015, at 06:57, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>
>> This will list the “undefined” references that are to be satisfied by the
>> shared libraries.
>>
>> Of course it is a mix of system libraries and GNUstep libraries, but you
>> wi
On 6 Jul 2015, at 06:57, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
> This will list the “undefined” references that are to be satisfied by the
> shared libraries.
>
> Of course it is a mix of system libraries and GNUstep libraries, but you will
> see the format of Obj-C methods.
No you won’t. Object
5 Jul 2015, at 11:06, James Carthew wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Does GNUstep have a status page similar to:
>>> http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/
>>> Which outlines the current API status of GNUstep in relation to
>&g
nd share that information.
Regards,
Doug
On Jul 5, 2015, at 4:24 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2015, at 11:06, James Carthew wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does GNUstep have a status page similar to:
>> http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/
>&
On 5 Jul 2015, at 11:06, James Carthew wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does GNUstep have a status page similar to:
> http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/
> Which outlines the current API status of GNUstep in relation to
> NextStep/Cocoa APIs? I haven't been ab
Hello,
Does GNUstep have a status page similar to:
http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/
Which outlines the current API status of GNUstep in relation to
NextStep/Cocoa APIs? I haven't been able to locate anything like this and I
think it would help to give people a better overvi
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote:
> If I don't build GS with http://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/libs/libobjc2/trunk
> and use /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/libobjc_gc.so.3 I'll get a warning
BTW, I didn't use any GC, probably just bad locate and mid-click paste
habit, sorry!
__
On 2011-03-17 09:21:34 -0400, David Chisnall said:
On 16 Mar 2011, at 01:01, John W Kennedy wrote:
And it is the standard compiler for the just-out Xcode 4, though GCC
4.6 and GCC/LLVM are also available. Because of its many hooks, it
vastly improves edit-time error detection.
Minor correc
On 16 Mar 2011, at 01:01, John W Kennedy wrote:
> And it is the standard compiler for the just-out Xcode 4, though GCC 4.6 and
> GCC/LLVM are also available. Because of its many hooks, it vastly improves
> edit-time error detection.
Minor correction. GCC4.2 and LLVM-GCC 4.2 (GCC 4.2 front end
On 2011-03-15 20:29:23 -0400, Nerijus Baliunas said:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:26:38 +0100 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
wrote:
have you considered compiling with clang? What are the issues with
GCC 4.6?
What you mean with clang?
clang is a C language family frontend for LLVM, LLVM is a collectio
Just a side note I've had a hard time getting clang (29 and trunk atm)
to compile GS by w/o crashing somewhere on Ubuntu Maverick (-O0 seems
to work) until I upgrade and use libffi from git. Not sure what the
bug was but my life can go on now.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Nerijus Baliunas
wro
On 16 Mar 2011, at 08:41, Nicola Pero wrote:
>
>> If I don't build GS with http://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/libs/libobjc2/trunk
>> and use /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/libobjc_gc.so.3 I'll get a warning
>>
>> NSLog(@"WARNING your program is becoming multi-threaded, but you are
>> using an ObjectiveC
> Does Objective-C++ work? I try g++ from ubuntu's gcc-snapshot
It works to a certain extent, but support for it is not by any means complete.
In particular, Objective-C exceptions in Objective-C++ simply don't work in
GCC 4.6. That may get fixed in 4.7.
> I try to compile a file.mm
>
> 3Σ_OBJC
Does Objective-C++ work? I try g++ from ubuntu's gcc-snapshot
g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 20110308-1) 4.6.0 20110308 (experimental) [trunk
revision 170786]
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for ME
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:26:38 +0100 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
wrote:
> >> have you considered compiling with clang? What are the issues with
> >> GCC 4.6?
> >>
> > What you mean with clang?
>
> clang is a C language family frontend for LLVM, LLVM is a collection
> of modular and reusable compile
Before we do any release we should give some time for current efforts
to complete and stabilize.
I would like to complete the work on the GNOME theme prior to the
release to make sure that there's no additional changes which must be
made in gnustep-GUI in order to support it fully.
GC
On Tue, Fe
Yes.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Ivan Vučica wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43, Nicola Pero > wrote:
>
>>
>> gnustep-make needs a bit of work before release too; trunk
>> contains a migration to the unix filesystem layout as default
>>
>
> Is that FHS?
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
> -
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43, Nicola Pero
wrote:
>
> gnustep-make needs a bit of work before release too; trunk
> contains a migration to the unix filesystem layout as default
>
Is that FHS?
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
--
Regards,
Ivan Vučica
___
Dis
> I am all for a GNUstep release, but with a bit of warning time before we do
> it.
> What about having a release at the end of Febuary/beginning of March?
> That should leave us some time to implement all the great ideas we get over
> FOSDEM
> and then some more time for others to test these :-
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:29:41 +0100
> Von: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
> An: Nicola Pero
> CC: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> Betreff: Next GNUstep releases (was: Re: Status of gnustep for gcc-4.6)
>
> Am 31.01.2011 um 21:06 schrieb Nicola P
Jochen,
Your email begs the question that there is a need to make changes to
GNUstep in order to make it work with GCC 4.6. This is not the case.
I have been testing GNUstep with GCC 4.6 for several weeks now. It
seems very solid. I have noticed no problems thusfar which could
directly be att
Am 31.01.2011 um 21:06 schrieb Nicola Pero:
Hi Jochen,
GNUstep trunk should work with gcc-4.6. I don't know myself when
the next gnustep-base
and gnustep-gui releases are scheduled for.
ideally we should schedule it around the time the new GCC is
released, better a little bit earlier s
Am 31.01.2011 um 21:00 schrieb Jochen Schmitt:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 31.01.2011 20:47, schrieb Ivan Vučica:
have you considered compiling with clang? What are the issues with
GCC 4.6?
What you mean with clang?
clang is a C language family frontend for LLVM, LL
On 31. sij. 2011., at 21:00, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> Am 31.01.2011 20:47, schrieb Ivan Vučica:
>>
>> have you considered compiling with clang? What are the issues with
>> GCC 4.6?
>>
> What you mean with clang?
By clang I was referring to the clang compiler instead of GCC. But, Nicola
pro
Hi Jochen,
GNUstep trunk should work with gcc-4.6. I don't know myself when
the next gnustep-base
and gnustep-gui releases are scheduled for.
Alternatively, you could look at my changes (from December) in gnustep
trunk (for gnustep-base
and gnustep-gui), and backport them to the version o
Hi Jochen,
GNUstep trunk should work with gcc-4.6. I don't know myself when the
next gnustep-base
and gnustep-gui releases are scheduled for.
Thanks
On 31 Jan 2011, at 20:28, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I'm the maintainer of serveral gnust
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 31.01.2011 20:47, schrieb Ivan Vučica:
>
> have you considered compiling with clang? What are the issues with
> GCC 4.6?
>
What you mean with clang?
I have several issues when I'm trying to compile gnustep-base
agains the new API of the libobjc. B
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 20:28, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
> I'm the maintainer of serveral gnustep packages on Fedora Linux.
>
> The Fedora project have decided to intruduced gcc-4.6 on Fedora linux
> which should release in may of this year.
>
> Because I have to find out, that I'm not ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I'm the maintainer of serveral gnustep packages on Fedora Linux.
The Fedora project have decided to intruduced gcc-4.6 on Fedora linux
which should release in may of this year.
Because I have to find out, that I'm not able to compile the cur
32 matches
Mail list logo
