ter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matt Prigge"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: OpenSource-Style Development
> It would be simple enough for opensrs to ad
t;William X. Walsh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: OpenSource-Style Development
> I disagreee I believe that if the RSP's would work together it would make
a
> better running machine
>
> I have be
ho do just that ( lend a
helping hand without expecting a gain from it )
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Prigge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 12:15 AM
Subject:
youre right though. It just really seems like a waste.
- Matt
- Original Message -
From: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Prigge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: OpenS
Hello Matt,
Wednesday, March 14, 2001, 9:27:10 PM, Matt Prigge wrote:
> Discussing this 'wassup' script, something that just came to mind: I
> think OpenSRS probably has a lot of competent programmers as RSPs who do a
> lot of work to get their own configurations in working order. Given the
Discussing this 'wassup' script, something that just came to mind: I
think OpenSRS probably has a lot of competent programmers as RSPs who do a
lot of work to get their own configurations in working order. Given the
present state of Tucow's development team (I certainly dont think they're
inco
