[ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread Derrick Peavy
Anyone have a good, working method of frame busting? I ask because the JS i have been using does not work when someone uses a web proxy (annon.) to browse a site. Examples that do not work (among many): SCRIPT LANGUAGE=JavaScript if (top.frames.length!=0)

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread axunderwood
Try if(top.location != self.location) top.location = self.location.; -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derrick Peavy Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:27 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin' Anyone have a

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread Dusty Hale
Derrick some afterthought . if these examples don't work, the example I sent will likely not work either. I know it works under normal circumstances. I wonder if you could possibly do a server name check to make sure you are not in someone elses frameset? Like if the server name is not the one

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread Teddy Payne
Ok, you three are scary. That code was all the same. Teddy On 12/1/06, Justin Haygood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If (window.top.location != window.location ) window.top.location = window.location; *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Derrick Peavy *Sent:*

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread Justin Haygood
Scary? Nah, just what I’ve been using for years J. Most people probably have been using it to… From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Teddy Payne Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:00 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin' Ok, you

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread Dusty Hale
Gees you scare easy . I offered a possible server side solution so you can't say the code is the same. My point is that JS is not going to work for this problem. Dusty _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Teddy Payne Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:00

[ACFUG Discuss] FOO used as a wildcard to discuss CF -- CF Relevant!

2006-12-01 Thread Robert Reil
FOO: I see FOO around a lot as a variable character set in examples. Teddy Payne uses it often in describing CF (Token phrase of CF relevance for those concerned about subject relevance) I just saw it in an explaination of Velocity The Apache Jakarta Project I was wondering why FOO?

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] FOO used as a wildcard to discuss CF -- CF Relevant!

2006-12-01 Thread Douglas Knudsen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foo DK On 12/1/06, Robert Reil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FOO: I see FOO around a lot as a variable character set in examples. Teddy Payne uses it often in describing CF (Token phrase of CF relevance for those concerned about subject relevance) I just saw

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] FOO used as a wildcard to discuss CF -- CF Relevant!

2006-12-01 Thread Charlie Arehart
Yes, I think it's a lesson worth repeating for everyone: even with something as trivial as what does foo mean, it's amazing what one can find on their own doing either a search or a lookup in Wikipedia. We truly live in amazing times. I remember when we'd have to trundle down to the library to

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread Charlie Arehart
Yes, it was on topic, Dusty. No worries (from my perspective, at least). Let's all settle down on this. It does serve as a reminder that we do have the community list as an alternative when a topic is expected to go beyond the bounds of the normal purpose of the list. Sometimes folks forget, and

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Frame bustin'

2006-12-01 Thread John Mason
Exactly, we all go off topic sometimes. I've been guilty on a few occasions myself. It's just a good idea to monitor yourself and move the discussion to community if it continues too long. When you make a reply, check yourself and say is this really related to coldfusion or is this banter. If it's