Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Email Issue.Had a test page with CFMail. I get emails even now...Why?

2007-01-25 Thread Douglas Knudsen
I've had similar things happen with skunk-work cfmail code sitting around. Someone in the company goes tinkering around, amazing that some folks get that bored, and land on the page and I'll get a email out of the blue. DK On 1/25/07, Ajas Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I had wri

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Email Issue.Had a test page with CFMail. I get emails even now...Why?

2007-01-25 Thread John Mason
Include an output of the cgi variables in the email. Specifically, cgi.remote_addr. That will help you track down who/what is hitting the page. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 5:12 PM T

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Email Issue.Had a test page with CFMail. I get emails even now...Why?

2007-01-25 Thread Ajas Mohammed
This is in our developement machine and it doesnt have meta tag. simple cfm page with the code I emailed earlier. Not accessible from outside and its in one of the development folders which i use often for testing. Something like snippets. Do you need any additional info? On 1/25/07, John Mason

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Email Issue.Had a test page with CFMail. I get emails even now...Why?

2007-01-25 Thread John Mason
Spiders or bots, there are lot's of apps running around index sites. Do you have the revisit deal in your meta tags telling spider to visit back in 5 days? John [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ajas Mohammed Sent: Thursday, January 2

[ACFUG Discuss] Email Issue.Had a test page with CFMail. I get emails even now...Why?

2007-01-25 Thread Ajas Mohammed
Hi, I had written a test page sometime back to test some email stuff in coldfusion. Here is the code where mydomainname is my comany's domain name. hello this is test This code is just in a cfm page and this was about 8 months back, but I have noticed that after every 4/5 days I get the s

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] XML to Spry in 6.1?

2007-01-25 Thread Charlie Arehart
To answer Andy and Teddy's clarifications, and perhaps Eric's continued confusion, he can't "just change it to returntype='string'". Notice that he (Eric) is referring to code that worked fine in CF7 and failed on 6.1. I was explaining first why it failed, which is indeed confusing to many and not

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] XML to Spry in 6.1?

2007-01-25 Thread Andrew Powell
Make sure you are using cfcontent to set teh mime type to "text/xml". On Jan 25, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Eric Gutke wrote: I'm a little perplexed now. When I sent the XML back as a string in my attempts yesterday, Spry was acting as if I was sending it nothing at all. Is there are specific way

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] XML to Spry in 6.1?

2007-01-25 Thread Eric Gutke
I'm a little perplexed now. When I sent the XML back as a string in my attempts yesterday, Spry was acting as if I was sending it nothing at all. Is there are specific way to send Spry the XML as a string? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] XML to Spry in 6.1?

2007-01-25 Thread Andrew Powell
Let's boil this down to the most basic. When generating XML for Spry (or any other form of AJAX), consider the XML a string. Stay away from the CF xml object (and returntype). Strings are your friend. ap On Jan 25, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Charlie Arehart wrote: Yes, even doing that in a CFC

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] XML to Spry in 6.1?

2007-01-25 Thread Teddy Payne
Why not return a string? Can you not convert the XML to a string and return it? On 1/25/07, Charlie Arehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, even doing that in a CFC method whose returntype is XML will cause it to be wrapped in a WDDX packet (when requested from a browser) prior to 7.0.1. Doin

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] XML to Spry in 6.1?

2007-01-25 Thread Charlie Arehart
Yes, even doing that in a CFC method whose returntype is XML will cause it to be wrapped in a WDDX packet (when requested from a browser) prior to 7.0.1. Doing it in a CFM should solve the problem for you. /Charlie http://www.carehart.org/blog/ _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM