Probably discussed to death 10 years ago, 5 years ago, one day ago. I
don't know. Can't find definitive answers.
Wondering...
Does anyone think or dare I ask does anyone "know" if one type of
variable structure is faster or less resource intensive than another?
In particular, I have an app
I'd look at what you need to solve here: do you really need client vars or
session vars?
performance wise, session vars would be faster as they are in RAM where you
have your client vars set to use a DB. A DB lookup is going to be slower
than RAM.
DK
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Derrick Pea
>From my experience anything will be faster than a cookie.
mf
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas
Knudsen
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:57 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Speed and resources: better to do
It is a balancing act. For sites without too many visitors I prefer session
vars for security and speed. "Too many" is a function of how much memory
the server has and if there are multiple sites running on it etc. Modern
hardware usually has so much memory that you can easily track thousands of
Also remember the more you have to add stuff to a cookie the longer the
request is going to run because the cookie is submitted on every request. So
right now it might be just a couple of variables but, as
scope inevitably creeps so will the time of every request.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:18 AM,
I am installing the coldfusion-702-win.exe trial on Windows 2003 R2 SP2 and am
running into problems. I checked the installation log and all items were
successful although I get an error message at the end of the process. I
uninstalled 7.0.0 completely and ran through the process of installing
Session variables are faster "generally" and solve all the issues you need.
There are always trade offs. For example saving the info in a session scope
with take up the server's memory as oppose to saving the info in a client
variable cookie, etc. But in most cases, approx. 98% of the time, the
ses
What is the error in the message?
John Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770.337.8363
www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hosting
Now offering VPS Plans running with VMware technology
Now offering ColdFusion 8 Enterprise hosting
FREE Subversion hosting
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
I second that.
"I think" however, and there is a big "I think" there that technically the
"request" scope is the fastest but of course it doesn't maintain state so
probably not what you want. If the variables don't change values then you
could consider the "application" scope.
-d
_
F
Can't speak to that
specific issue, but have you seen
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=228c3aaa
"ColdFusion MX 7
installation fails on Windows 2003 with SP1"
?
Also, when I had install
issues, I learned a lot by comparing miscellaneous
.xml configuration files betwee
No error message on the last try. When it finishes, it tries to open the CF
Admin to do the auto-configuring of the web server. It tells me that it
reaches the web server but cannot display the page. It is not the usual "Page
cannot be found" or "Page cannot be displayed" error that is common
> It tells me that it reaches the web server but cannot display the page.
It is not the usual "Page cannot be found" or "Page cannot be displayed"
error that is common with IIS.
Check your web server extensions, you should have several for coldfusion. If
not, simply run the IISconnector batch fil
12 matches
Mail list logo
