I just posted my notes from the keynote this morning at my blog,
www.codfusion.com The keynote covered a lot of new features coming in the
next release of Coldfusion.
John Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770.337.8363
www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hosting
Now offering VPS Plans running with
Implicit getters/setters
The cfproperty will generate the implicit getters and setters on the
backend to save you from writing the code.
nice! Was overriding mentioned for these?
DK
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:28 AM, John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just posted my notes from the keynote
Yes, so if you have your own getters/setters then CF will use those. If they
are not present, then the implicit ones will take effect. I can only imagine
how much code this will save everyone from typing.
John Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770.337.8363
www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex
I also saw that CF will now be FREE for academic use, including
Enterprise. That's fantastic. Very very cool.
-Cameron
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Douglas Knudsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Implicit getters/setters
The cfproperty will generate the implicit getters and setters on the
What if you have already written your own framework to use the
cfproperty tag for this very thing? I guess I'll have to wait and see.
Gerry Gurevich
Application Development
NIEHS ITSS Contractor
Lockheed Martin Information Technology
919-361-5444 ext 311
Which of course sucks if you want encapsulation and limits on the
setters/getters based on authorization. Is this controllable in some
manner?
-dhs
Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free speech exercised both individually and through a free press, is
a necessity in any country
I should say beyond having to implement your own setters/getters...
which still doesn't really solve the problem of properties which you
explicitly do not want setters/getters on unless you throw exceptions
on the unimplemented ones. Yuck.
-dhs
Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
These sorts of questions are why people participate in alpha/beta
programs. These are all points which should be brought up and aired
out WAY before the final bits ship. Some thoughts come to mind
1) Add access attributes to cfproperty for public/private
2) Add roles attribute for
What I would want to is annotate the properties to say whether the
getter/setter should be autogenerated, that way it leaves control to
the developer. I like the idea of the addition of a roles check for
authorization to call specific setters/getters.
Also, is the autogenerated
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Dean H. Saxe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would want to is annotate the properties to say whether the
getter/setter should be autogenerated, that way it leaves control to the
developer.
If you don't want it autogenerated, just call it private. It's not
Anyone out there have good experience configuring some of the more
advanced JDBC options for a CF - Oracle Cluster connection?
...and the time to help out with it? (and get paid for your time)
Email me @ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Cameron
--
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc
http://www.sumoc.com
I can see a reason to have auto generated getters and setters based on a
database table (and possibly typed) but you can effectivley do this now with
a missing method handler...
I'm guessing this is based on a table somewhere?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Cameron Childress [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, if it follows the pattern seen in AS3, it would be something like
this... Given a property definition like this:
cfcomponent
cfproperty name=firstname type=String access=public roles=Admin,User /
[]
/cfcomponent
You'd get two implicit getters/setters with the signature
But that's pretty much what they are talking about and it's how AS3 handles
it. I can't see why they would implement it differently.
John Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770.337.8363
www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hosting
Now offering VPS Plans running with VMware technology
Now offering
14 matches
Mail list logo
