TED]>
To: discussion@acfug.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2007 3:49:04 PM
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Managing Document Download
You can do that with most PDF writers too, like PrimoPDF. No need then to
reprocess it every time.
-dhs
Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If li
a measure
of protection that would thwart a casual user.
- Original Message
From: Dean H. Saxe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: discussion@acfug.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2007 3:33:43 PM
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Managing Document Download
Your plan is good. But people can still
casual user.
- Original Message
From: Dean H. Saxe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: discussion@acfug.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2007 3:33:43 PM
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Managing Document Download
Your plan is good. But people can still email around the PDF, making the
tracking of it dif
Your plan is good. But people can still email around the PDF, making
the tracking of it difficult.
-dhs
Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Free speech exercised both individually and through a free press, is
a necessity in any country where people are themselves free."
-- Theo
additional thought... since you are probably sending this based on
some sort of email list why dont you use that as the url parameter.
On 8/7/07, Steven Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cfcontent the file and serve it based on some sort of url code, and
> code it based on each email so you can tr
cfcontent the file and serve it based on some sort of url code, and
code it based on each email so you can track who is actually
downloading it. The only way to block it from being forwarded would be
to only allow 1 download but, not sure if you want to do that.
On 8/7/07, Clarke Bishop <[EMAIL PR
I am doing the "free gift" marketing thing. You know, register for the
newsletter, and we'll send you a free white paper.
I was just attaching the white paper PDF to the e-mail, but I'm concerned
that is not the best practice. Spam filters might strip off the attachment.
So, maybe it would be b
