Besides the fact that 5 is hopelessly out of date? I'd use Google to
enumerate the differences. The big one is MX is a Java based
application and runs on common app servers (e.g. WebSphere, Tomcat,
etc.)
-dhs
Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dissent is the purest form of
Eric, welcome to the list. There's actually quite a few differences because
CF made the jump to Java back in version 6. Are you migrating a site from
CF5 or something? Feel free to provide some more information so we can help.
John Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770.337.8363
www.FusionLink.com -
into? (The
program is a shopping cart using a couple of arrays and a login cookie
system).
Thanks in advance,
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:58 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] 5.0 vs MX
and all
copies and backups thereof.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of E.E.
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:17 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] 5.0 vs MX: Difference?
I have a CF application using MS SQL and CF 5.0. I'm trying
future. If anyone's
interested, drop me a line ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
/charlie
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:10 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] 5.0 vs MX: Difference?
Here's
