RE: [ACFUG Discuss] "FOO" used as a wildcard to discuss "CF" <-- CF Relevant!

2006-12-01 Thread Charlie Arehart
really does amaze me everyday. /Charlie http://www.carehart.org/blog/ _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Knudsen Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:28 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] "FOO" used as a wildcard

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] "FOO" used as a wildcard to discuss "CF" <-- CF Relevant!

2006-12-01 Thread Dusty Hale
Metasyntatic Variables That just sounds totally cool !!! :-) Dusty _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Knudsen Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:28 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] "FOO" used as a wildcard

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] "FOO" used as a wildcard to discuss "CF" <-- CF Relevant!

2006-12-01 Thread Dusty Hale
Hey I have always wondered that too. Isn't "FOO" just a trendy way to do examples? Sort of like a "Hello World" or a "bob" :-) . although those are usually used as example output values. Dusty _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Reil Sent: Fri

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] "FOO" used as a wildcard to discuss "CF" <-- CF Relevant!

2006-12-01 Thread Douglas Knudsen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foo DK On 12/1/06, Robert Reil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FOO: I see "FOO" around a lot as a variable character set in examples. Teddy Payne uses it often in describing CF (Token phrase of CF relevance for those concerned about subject relevance) I just sa