Re: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-17 Thread Steve Drucker
Try passing the cfid and cftoken back from the third party server to cf over the URL. Regards, Steve Drucker Founder Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com On Jun 17, 2009, at 9:00 PM, sravan kumar wrote: Hi, We are converting our applications from CF5 to CF8

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-17 Thread sravan kumar
ravan From: sdruc...@figleaf.com To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:04:47 -0400 CC: discussion@acfug.org Try passing the cfid and cftoken back from the third party server to cf over the URL. Regards, Steve Drucker Founder Fig

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-17 Thread Charlie Arehart
ehalf Of sravan kumar Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:13 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 Tried the same (appending CFID and CFTOKEN in the form POST) but still CF8 generating a new CFID and CFTOKEN as soon we get a request from third party. i d

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-18 Thread Mike Staver
well. > > > > thanks > > Sravan > > > > > > From: sdruc...@figleaf.com > To: discussion@acfug.org > Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:04:47 -0400 > CC: discussion@acfug.org > > > Try passing the cfi

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-18 Thread Cameron Childress
F8 creating a new session when infact it see a > > valid CFID and CFTOKEN in the URL as well. > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > Sravan > > > > > > > > > > > > From: sdruc...@figleaf.com > > To: discussion@acfug.org > &g

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-18 Thread Charlie Arehart
To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 Sravan- I would say that if "Use J2EE Session Variables" is turned on in the CFAdmin and the remote system is to using CFID/CFTOKEN pairs instead, that would definitely result in the behavior you

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-19 Thread sravan kumar
g.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:53:36 -0400 …because you would instead need to be sending the jsessionid cookie instead. I was about to write the same answer as Cameron, but adding that little detail. ;--} /charlie From: ad...@acfu

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-19 Thread sravan kumar
it is a new session. \ thanks sravan > Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:31:42 -0600 > Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 > From: sta...@fimble.com > To: discussion@acfug.org > > I've had issues with CF 7 & 8 before in cases where I had the J2EE >

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-19 Thread sravan kumar
yes, i verified that they are passing CFID and CFTOKEN in URL parameters of the action page. thanks sravan From: char...@carehart.org To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:33:03 -0400 Sravan, CF will only

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-19 Thread Mike Staver
> \ > > thanks > > sravan > > > >> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:31:42 -0600 >> Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 >> From: sta...@fimble.com >> To: discussion@acfug.org >> >> I've had issues with CF 7 & 8 before

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-19 Thread Charlie Arehart
#x27;t solve the problem, you won't have to pay. :-) More at carehart.org/consulting/. /charlie From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of sravan kumar Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 5:25 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-19 Thread sravan kumar
i will try it out and let you know the results. we have already opened a ticket to adobe but so far no positive response. thanks again, Sravan From: char...@carehart.org To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:23:59

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-22 Thread sravan kumar
i tried this in between two cf servers and it works well. i was able to access other CF server page from html page. Any other ideas? thanks Sravan > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:11:05 -0600 > Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 > From: sta...@fimble

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-23 Thread Mike Staver
n between two cf servers and it works well. i was able to > access other CF server page from html page. > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > thanks > > Sravan > > > >> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:11:05 -0600 >> Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on iss

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-23 Thread Charlie Arehart
ect: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 i tried this in between two cf servers and it works well. i was able to access other CF server page from html page. Any other ideas? thanks Sravan > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:11:05 -0600 > Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8

2009-06-23 Thread sravan kumar
i tried both. third party is using .NET application. i asked them to send the code they are using to post to our server. thanks Sravan > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:09:22 -0600 > Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 > From: sta...@fimble.com > To

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 (Solved)

2009-07-26 Thread sravan kumar
or without enabling JessionID in app settings). thanks to you all. ~Sravan From: char...@carehart.org To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] single sign-on issue CF 8 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:23:59 -0400 I saw your later note saying you’re sending those session keys