After a frenetic, and long, day and night, Shad has got us back up and
running again.
I won't mention the small router issue ;-)
A big thank you to him from all of us for all his hard work.
B. Rgds
John
___
Discussion about project organisation and ove
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:28:14 +0200, John Crisp wrote:
> After a frenetic, and long, day and night, Shad has got us back up and
> running again.
Well done guys.
> I won't mention the small router issue ;-)
I won't mention it's only two months after the date on the holding page.
B-)
--
Cheer
Now contribs is back up and the dust is settling, probably quite literally,
how easy would it to build a "refresh" or "maintenace release" of the SME
8.0 ISO?
Earlier in the week I took the plunge to upgrade my only (and live) 7.6
server to SME 8.0. Over all it was a fairly painless process but
Il 15/06/2013 13.31, Dave Liquorice ha scritto:
Now contribs is back up and the dust is settling, probably quite literally,
how easy would it to build a "refresh" or "maintenace release" of the SME
8.0 ISO?
Earlier in the week I took the plunge to upgrade my only (and live) 7.6
server to SME 8.0
Dave Liquorice wrote:
>Now contribs is back up and the dust is settling, probably quite
>literally,
>how easy would it to build a "refresh" or "maintenace release" of the
>SME
>8.0 ISO?
>
>Earlier in the week I took the plunge to upgrade my only (and live) 7.6
>
>server to SME 8.0. Over all i
Yes, this needs Shad’s comment.
I can see the attractiveness of it due to the huge number of updates.
Ian
From: discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org
[mailto:discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org] On Behalf Of John Crisp
Sent: 15 June 2013 12:27
To: discussion@lists.contribs.org
Subjec
I think this would be a good idea. It is something that is easily done.
On Jun 15, 2013 9:07 PM, "Ian Wells" wrote:
> Yes, this needs Shad’s comment.
>
> ** **
>
> I can see the attractiveness of it due to the huge number of updates.
>
> ** **
>
> Ian
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* discussion
In that case can we knock one out then ?
What needs to be done ?
B. Rgd
John
"Shad L. Lords" wrote:
>I think this would be a good idea. It is something that is easily
>done.
>On Jun 15, 2013 9:07 PM, "Ian Wells" wrote:
>
>> Yes, this needs Shad’s comment.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I can see the
