On 14/01/13 17:49, Filippo Carletti wrote:
> [English is not my native language, please bear it in mind if some of
> my sentences may seem incorrect/inappropriate]
>
Sounds pretty good to me !!!
> We have been and still are very open to discussion.
>
> But the discussion that took place in the
On 15/01/13 03:49, Filippo Carletti wrote:
[English is not my native language, please bear it in mind if some of
my sentences may seem incorrect/inappropriate]
I also don't understand why this effort wasn't put into SME
Server 8. Supporting both simply won't happen and the guaranteed
fragmenta
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Filippo Carletti <
filippo.carle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [English is not my native language, please bear it in mind if some of
> my sentences may seem incorrect/inappropriate]
>
If my German and French were anywhere near your English, I would be
delighted.
> I als
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>
> These sounds like good goals, and, I believe are totally in line with SME
> Server development over the years. We always avoided forks from upstream
> unless there was no option (templates helped immensely here) and made some
> choices base
> Its 'accept everything
> and bounce bad addresses later' policy forced me to drop SME as mail
> servers long ago. Maybe that was fixed eventually...
>
So we are able to harvest some possible development targets during the last
few days.
@Gordon, Agree with the focus on patching, testing, testi
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Michael Dittmer
wrote:
>
> I don’t know what I would do without SME Server, except have to fight our
> FTP box all day.
>
Basically without SME server you have to configure the underlying
applications manually. Which, ironically, means that if you
understand that
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> >
> > These sounds like good goals, and, I believe are totally in line with SME
> > Server development over the years. We always avoided forks from upstream
> > unless there was no option (template
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
> @all, could you please provide your 1 liner 'support or not' to this
> thread? Your short constructive feedback would provide an idea about the
> current willingness to add to our efforts.
No, people, please don't flood the list which such posts. If y
> The whole "board" concept was to provide a financial base for the
> distribution. That failed, multiple times.
I think that we are offering a financial base, in a sense. :-)
> Having patches refused and modified is a normal part of development. As long
> as those discussions were openly tracked
Thank you Filippo.
Additional questions if I may.
Nethesis is an established commercial venture. You could find more
information (in Italian) on our website, our blog or our pages in the
primary social networks.
We "sell" support in Italian language, by phone or email. We are
paying for developme
[Modules list]
> a) Which of these are free and which of these need to be subscribe to?
All free. See http://code.nethesis.it/.
> b) These modules will be "bunched up" by category (Neth service, Neth
> security etc), what will be the cost of annual subscription?
You could create a custom cd tha
This is good news.
Thanks Filippo.
chris
On 17/01/13 01:24, Filippo Carletti wrote:
[Modules list]
a) Which of these are free and which of these need to be subscribe to?
All free. See http://code.nethesis.it/.
b) These modules will be "bunched up" by category (Neth service, Neth
security et
Please try not to double post in two list (discussion and devinfo), OK?
2013-01-17 00:02, chris burnat skrev:
This is good news.
Thanks Filippo.
chris
On 17/01/13 01:24, Filippo Carletti wrote:
[Modules list]
a) Which of these are free and which of these need to be subscribe to?
All free. S
13 matches
Mail list logo
