[discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-16 Thread John Crisp
Having read through some of the recent stuff I suddenly realised a fundamental point of the original conversation I had with Stefano that kicked off a lot of the discussions might have been missed, so I am going to try and note it here just to be sure, to be sure. This all started because a little

Re: [discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-16 Thread Jim McLaren
On 16/02/16 16:27, John Crisp wrote: So the point of the exercise was never to prove that one panel system or framework was better than another. Nor was it to say definitively we should use cockpit. We were really trying to find solutions to a couple of issues we (SME) have had for a longtime.

Re: [discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-16 Thread Stefano Zamboni
Il 16/02/2016 18:43, Jim McLaren ha scritto: One quick question. Would it be any harder for someone such as yourself to write a panel with mojo as a framework, rather than cockpit? IOW once a new server-manager has been written with Mojolicious is it as easy to use thereafter? I'll try t

Re: [discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-16 Thread Terry Fage
On 17/02/2016 5:20 AM, Stefano Zamboni wrote: > Il 16/02/2016 18:43, Jim McLaren ha scritto: >> >> One quick question. Would it be any harder for someone such as yourself to >> write a panel with mojo as a framework, rather than cockpit? IOW once a new >> server-manager has been written with Mojol

Re: [discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-17 Thread Filippo Carletti
> I had a lot of long chats with Filippo last year at FOSDEM. FormMagick > was just one of the reasons they went their own way. They wanted > something that might attract devs with some general coding skills that > are easily available today. HTML/CSS/JS are clearly popular. Lets leave > out PHP as

Re: [discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-17 Thread stephane de Labrusse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/02/2016 15:20, Filippo Carletti a écrit : > But NethGUI, while aesthetically appreciated, is still hard to use > (ask Stephane or Giacomo :-) ). mort de rire :) LOL - -- Cordialement Stéphane de Labrusse Membre de l'Aru2Lhttp://www.aru2L

Re: [discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-24 Thread John Crisp
On 17 February 2016 15:20:04 CET, Filippo Carletti wrote: >> I had a lot of long chats with Filippo last year at FOSDEM. >FormMagick >> was just one of the reasons they went their own way. They wanted >> something that might attract devs with some general coding skills >that >> are easily avail

Re: [discussion] Server-Manager

2016-02-25 Thread Filippo Carletti
> If you started from scratch today, with a clean sheet, what would you use ? I'm relaying other's opinions. Our #2 rule is "follow upstream", so I must say "cockpit". A second choice would be angular+nodejs, because we have a lot of expertise here. > PS great night again with you team in Brusse