Am 04.11.2016 um 09:51 schrieb Reinhard Müller:
...
> currently "Fellow" is the word we use for people who support us
> with a regular financial contribution. It's nothing where you are
> formally included or excluded. However, if you are, strictly
> speaking, not a Fellow right now, you may still
Dear Theo,
Am 2016-11-04 um 09:29 schrieb Theo Schmidt:
> (who it appears is still a Fellow in spite of being in arrears with
> payments because not having been formally excluded - have I got this right?)
currently "Fellow" is the word we use for people who support us with a
regular financial con
Am 03.11.2016 um 15:19 schrieb Erik Albers:
> Dear all,
...
> Are you in favor or against having a general Code of Conduct?
A bit in favour, but not under this name and probably not as a new document.
> Are you in favor or against having this Code of Conduct?
Against. Should be a sho
On 03.11.2016 15:19, Erik Albers wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Are you in favor or against having a general Code of Conduct?
+1: In favor.
> Are you in favor or against having this Code of Conduct?
Sections like "Be collaborative" and "Be open" make me cringe. You
literally explain how c
