Silent majority (was: supporting our fellowship representative)

Hi all, I don't know nothing about what's been talked about in this thread. This is just a reminder that there are probably many subscribers like me who don't have a clue of what is at stake here. Perhaps you should gather in a field, organize a tournament and come back when someone wins -- or h

Re: Price transparency (was Re: Input on anticompetitive characteristic of public code)

Hi Paul, Paul Boddie writes: > Sorry to take this discussion in another direction - hence the > subject change - but even the costs of traditional proprietary > software may not be transparent. Indeed - thanks for completing my idea. This helps me draw a new distinction. My traditional answer

Re: Mozilla first, now FSFE?

Hi Charles, C. Cossé writes: > Bastien, why does OLPC participate in GSoC when Google violates your > values? Just to be precise: I'm not from OLPC, I'm from OLPC France, an independant grassroots. Also OLPC did not participate to GSoC, Sugar Labs (https://sugarlabs.org) does. I guess Sugar L