On 28.08.2018 09:29, Bernhard E. Reiter wrote:
> Am Dienstag 28 August 2018 01:19:54 schrieb Guido Arnold:
>> We need a decentralized infrastructure that makes their intentions
>> irrelevant.
>
> This is the direction where I believe we must head.
>
Just want to throw in a relevant link to a p
The snarky-ness on this entire ML starts being a burden to read.
Probably I represent more people than myself with that view.
Everybody, please be more excellent to each other.
I know you can :)
Cheers,
Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
On 29.09.2017 18:18, Bjoern Schiessle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in October I will give a talk about how Free Software can help to
> export wealth and knowledge to development country in order to empower
> them.
>
> For this I'm looking for some good examples. In the past there was the
> "One Laptop pe
On 26.07.2017 10:05, Max Mehl wrote:
> # mray [2017-07-25 22:36 +0200]:
>> Services that could potentially be harmful aren't the issue. It is about
>> not explicitly stating that we know some of them *are definitively*
>> harmful. Yet all we say is: "Be vigila
On 25.07.2017 22:22, Max Mehl wrote:
> # mray [2017-07-25 22:02 +0200]:
>> On 25.07.2017 21:44, mray wrote:
>>> Reaching people isn't the end goal. Just like market share isn't.
>>> We are about freedom. What if I asked FSFE to tweet its take on using
>
On 25.07.2017 21:44, mray wrote:
> Reaching people isn't the end goal. Just like market share isn't.
> We are about freedom. What if I asked FSFE to tweet its take on using
> twitter? Wouldn' the honest tweet be:
>
>"You should not use twitter
On 25.07.2017 14:56, Max Mehl wrote:
> # Daniel Pocock [2017-07-25 14:37 +0200]:
>> What is the value of 1000 new followers though?
>>
>> Are people actually switching to free software, or are the followers,
>> shares and likes more like monopoly money which is never converted into
>> anything ta
On 21.06.2017 12:45, mray wrote:
>
>
> I think treating them as second class could be OK:
>
> 1. post on a free software platform
> 2. don't reply on twitter or facebook, just link to the original
>
>
> -Robert
>
Following this whole thread I think I c
On 22.06.2017 22:05, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
...
> Does a man who is overweight lose weight by continuing to eat donuts?
>
> Or does he lose weight by going to the gym and acting like the man he
> wants to become?
>
> ...
For me – as far as analogies go – it is more like an environmental
ac
On 21.06.2017 12:22, Erik Albers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Maybe you noted in the Newsletter May [1] a pro and contra between our
> Executive Director and our Fellowship representative:
>
> On the FSFE's Planet, we had an interesting dialogue popping up
> between our executive director J
e with all kinds of transportation like cars, buses, planes,...)
Other concerns about maintenance sound sensible as well.
> On Dec 17, 2016 8:55 AM, "mray" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 17.12.2016 07:56, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>> Elevators used to h
On 17.12.2016 07:56, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Elevators used to have drivers before computers were invented
>
Very good point.
I'd love to know that even elevators run free software, though.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On 03.11.2016 15:19, Erik Albers wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Are you in favor or against having a general Code of Conduct?
+1: In favor.
> Are you in favor or against having this Code of Conduct?
Sections like "Be collaborative" and "Be open" make me cringe. You
literally explain how c
13 matches
Mail list logo
