Wow - what did you do to that Web-Interface? Release all brakes? Did not expect to see any difference..
Thanks - good job!
Holger
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 00:24 +0100, Holger Bauer wrote:
For a full list of changes see: http://pfsense.blogspot.com/2006/10/101-released.html
Holger
Im dealing with this small town ISP on a project and
they informed the customer that they can run multiple IPs over PPPoE. Ive
googled a bit cant tell for sure whether this is supported vary widely, but
has anyone setup this configuration with a pfsense box?
Do you have to create a new
They'll likely configure the PPPoE tunnel with a /29 CIDR block (maybe
smaller, maybe larger, depending on addresses). You are correct, the
addresses will essentially just appear on the pfSense endpoint. All
you need to do to make use of them is create an other type virtual
IP (hey, for all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam Newnam wrote:
I'm dealing with this small town ISP on a project and they informed the
customer that they can run multiple IP's over PPPoE. I've googled a bit
can't tell for sure whether this is supported vary widely, but has
anyone setup this
Thanks Bill - That makes sense - having not done it before I just didn't
want to walk in there with my pants down...
Maybe I'll through a tutorial on the wiki or something
Sam Newnam
SystemSam Technologies, LLC
www.systemsam.com
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Bill,
i'm running a Acrosser AR-B1662. In other words that's a VIA Processor Eden 667 MHz Process with a VIA Apollo PLE133T chipset and on-board 4 National Semiconductor 83816, (10/100) NICs. It's got 256MMemory installed.
Why? Can you imagine a change that has any influence?
Thanks,
On 10/30/06, Holger Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
i'm running a Acrosser AR-B1662. In other words that's a VIA Processor Eden
667 MHz Process with a VIA (r) Apollo PLE133T chipset and on-board 4 National
Semiconductor 83816, (10/100) NICs. It's got 256MMemory installed.
Why? Can
FYI, this is pretty standard (assigning a framed-route via radius or whatever) for business class DSL provisioning. I did this all the time when I worked for an ISP and rolled my own DSL. As far as I've seen most DSL providers that use PPPoE (ATT is the big one) do it this way.
nbOn 10/30/06,
I upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 on a Soekris 4801 running from disk (not
flash). From looking at the change list, I expected to remove the rules
permitting access to 127.0.0.1. Without such a rule, ftp fails as before,
with it works as before. Have I misinterpreted the change note?
smime.p7s
