Hi
I wonder: Has there really been no activity on this list since Dec 21 or has my
feed been cut ?
Happy NewYear
Claus
My apologies for requesting read receipts - I forgot to switch it off :-(
Please ignore
-Original Message-
From: cl...@pfsense [mailto:pfse...@mail-fwd.archie.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 6:36 PM
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense book now
y, November 04, 2009 6:17 PM
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense book now available for purchase
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:13 PM, cl...@pfsense
wrote:
> Can't wait for the electronic version :-)
I believe only commercial support customers will have acces
Can't wait for the electronic version :-)
-Original Message-
From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eu...@leitl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 5:14 PM
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense book now available for purchase
Just ordered mine.
http://www.amazon.com/
l.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Buechler
Posted At: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:51 PM
Posted To: pfSense
Conversation: [pfSense-discussion] QoS / multiple network interfaces
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] QoS / multiple network interfaces
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:55 AM, cl...@
Hi
I have VOIP on eth3, LAN on eth2 and wan on eth0
I have setup QoS using the shaping wizard and as result two rules exist
VOIP -> WAN
WAN -> VOIP
However when I (using LAN) uploaded a huge (3G) file this weekend I
noticed very poor quality on the VOIP in terms of long delays etc.
My question
scanning
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 04:10, cl...@pfsense wrote:
> To test my new configuration can anyone recommend a secure, thorough online
> port scanner ?
What qualifies thorough? Although nmap's aggressive mode pretty well
covers most "there's a port open and this is wh
Hi
Slightly off topic:
To test my new configuration can anyone recommend a secure, thorough
online port scanner ?
Thanks
Claus
