I'm screwed up after yesterday's update. The firewall
stopped routing after yesterday's upgrade
to 2.0-BETA5 built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011
The firewall seems to see everthing
(with the exception of package updates:
"Unable to communicate with www.pfsense.com. Please
verify DNS and interf
Guten Tag Eugen Leitl,
I found on the snapshot server two betas one for x86 and one amd64.
BETA4 for 27.Dec.
Tell me what you need.
am Sonntag, 2. Januar 2011 um 11:00 hat u.a.
in mid:20110102100015.gt16...@leitl.org geschrieben:
> As I can't browse the web, can someone toss
> me an URL for a la
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:23:13PM +0100, Alexander Lesle wrote:
> Guten Tag Eugen Leitl,
Thanks Alexander. I've put up my backup ALIX meanwhile,
which I keep around for such just purposes. I'll try
to download the latest snapshot .iso, and reinstall
from scratch. Resetting to factory defaults is
Guten Tag Eugen Leitl,
here is the snapshot server: http://snapshots.pfsense.org/
Good luck. :-)
am Sonntag, 2. Januar 2011 um 12:41 hat u.a.
in mid:20110102114141.gx16...@leitl.org geschrieben:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:23:13PM +0100, Alexander Lesle wrote:
>> Guten Tag Eugen Leitl,
> Thank
On 1/2/2011 5:00 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> I'm screwed up after yesterday's update. The firewall
> stopped routing after yesterday's upgrade
> to 2.0-BETA5 built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011
>
> The firewall seems to see everthing
> (with the exception of package updates:
> "Unable to communi
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:06:54AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
> Actually it looks like the packages aren't loading on pfSense.com, which
> would cause that error. It probably isn't related to the snapshots
> except that it may be trying (and failing) to reinstall packages after
> the upgrade.
FWIF,
On 1/2/2011 10:09 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:06:54AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> Actually it looks like the packages aren't loading on pfSense.com, which
>> would cause that error. It probably isn't related to the snapshots
>> except that it may be trying (and failing) t
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
> If there is, it's probably related to the packages you had installed...
I agree it's probably the packages. I've noticed it before, so
usually I purge the packages before upgrade. Got lazy this
time.
I think I'll purge the packages a
On 1/2/2011 10:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> If there is, it's probably related to the packages you had installed...
>
> I agree it's probably the packages. I've noticed it before, so
> usually I purge the packages before upgrade. Go
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:44:07AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
> The packages should be OK again now.
See the packages, upgrade of the other systems (from a
snapshot of 15 days ago) was uneventful (I purged whatever
few packages I had).
Is carp+pfsync cluster failover working on the 1. Jan snapshot
On 1/2/2011 12:35 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:44:07AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> The packages should be OK again now.
>
> See the packages, upgrade of the other systems (from a
> snapshot of 15 days ago) was uneventful (I purged whatever
> few packages I had).
>
> Is c
11 matches
Mail list logo
